SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 14906

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.I.ARUN AND B. MURALIDHARA PAI
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
DURGAPPA S/O. DURGAPPA CHANNADASAR ALIAS MECHANNAVAR – Respondent
WA 100175/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI WRIT APPEAL NO. 100175 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB)

BETWEEN:

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, PLOT NO.33/A, LAKAMANAHALLI INDUSTRIAL AREA, P.B. ROAD, DHARWAD – 580 008.

… APPELLANT (BY SRI. VEERESH R BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. DURGAPPA, S/O. DURGAPPA CHANNADASAR @ MECHANNAVAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: GURUNATH NAGAR, HALE HUBBALLI-24, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, Digitally signed by R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, Location: High M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, BENGALURU – 560 001.

Dharwad

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD DISTRICT, OFFICE OF THE D.C., DHARWAD-580 001.

… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.S.YADRAMI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. NARAYANA V.YAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, PRL. GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO WRIT PETITION NO.85557/2013(LA-KIADB) FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BEFORE THE LD. SINGLE JUDGE FOR THIS HON’BLE COURT; AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.02.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NOS. 85557/2013(LA-KIADB) AND FURTHER TO DISMISS THE SAID WRIT PETITIONS.

THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI

JUDGMENT

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN)

Aggrieved by the order dated 23.02.2024 passed in W.P.

No.85557/2013, Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, respondent No.3 therein has preferred this appeal.

2. On 19.08.2006, a Preliminary Notification was issued under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (for short, ‘the Act’), to acquire certain lands for establishment of IT/BT park at Dharwad, which included the land which is the subject matter of the writ petition. After providing necessary opportunity to the landlosers to file their objections, a Final Notification was issued under Section 28(4) of the Act on 06.10.2006. By issuance of the Final Notification, the lands stood vested with the government.

3. Thereafter, efforts were made to determine the compensation by way of consent. In this regard, there were various correspondences exchanged between the appellant and respondent No.1-landloser, which resulted in respondent No.1 giving his consent for the compensation so determined. An indemnity bond dated 10.06.2009 has been executed in this regard. The agreement dated 10.06.2009 (Annexure-R2) reads as under:

¥Àæw§AzsÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ M¥ÀàAzÀªÀ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ PÀgÁgÀÄ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸À£ï 2009 £Éà ¸Á°£À dÆ£À ªÀiÁºÉ 10£Éà ¢£ÁAPÀzÀ°è zÁs gÀªÁqÀ f¯Éè ºÀħâ½î vÁ®ÆPÀÄ ºÀħâ½î ºÉÆÃ§½ vÁjºÁ¼À UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉÃð £ÀA. 63 «¹ÛÃtð 6-36 £ÉÃzÀÝgÀ ¨sÀƪÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ: C£ÀĨsÀªÀzÁgÀ: ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀ: ºÀPÀÄÌzÁgÀ£ÁzÀ zÀÄgÀUÀ¥Àà ZÀ£ÀßzÁ¸ÀgÀ G¥sÀð ªÉÄÃZÀ£ÀߪÀgÀ CªÀgÀ ªÀÄPÀ̼ÀÄ zÀÄUÀð¥Àà DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ:£ÁªÀÅ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV ¸ÀÆa¹gÀĪÀAvÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ §gÉzÀÄPÉÆlÖ M¥ÀAzÀzÀ PÀgÁgÀÄ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÀ¼É£ÉAzÀgÉ, F PɼÀPÀAqÀ £À£Àß ºÀPÀÄÌzÁgÀjUÉ M¼À¥ÀlÄÖ zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f¯Éè ºÀħâ½î vÁ®ÆPÀÄ ºÀħâ½î ºÉÆÃ§½ vÁjºÁ¼À UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉÃð £ÀA. 63 «¹ÛÃtð 6-36 £ÉÃzÀÝgÀ CAzÀgÉ ¥ÀÇtð E®èªÉà ¨sÁUÀ±ÀB d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ PÉÊUÁjPÁ ¥ÀæzÉñÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÁAiÉÄÝ 1966 gÀr PÉÊUÁjPÁ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV ¨sÀÆ ¸Áé¢üãÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆArzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ «¢ü 28(6) gÀAvÉ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀPÉÌ ¸Áé¢üãÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ¨sÀÆ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ: ºÀPÀÄÌzÁgÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁzÀ £ÀªÀÄäUÀ½UÉ £ÉÆÃnøÀÄ eÁåj ªiÀ ÁrzÀÄÝ «¢ü 29(2) gÀAvÉ ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÀÆ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÁzÀ £ÀªÀÄUÉ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ zsÀ£À ¸ÀAzÁAiÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¥ÀjºÁgÀzsÀ£À ¤UÀ¢ü ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀPÀÆÌ ºÁUÀÆ ¨sÀÆ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÁzÀ £ÀªÀÄUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀj M¥ÀàAzÀzÀ PÀgÁj£ÀAvÉ ¥ÀjºÁgÀzsÀ£À ¸ÀAzÁAiÀ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top