SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 15306

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANU SIVARAMAN AND VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
SMT. VARALAKSHMI M V – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WPHC 113/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL W.P.H.C. NO.113/2025 BETWEEN:

SMT. VARALAKSHMI M.V.

W/O RAVI V AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.99/2, NEAR DUGGALAMMA TEMPLE LAGGERE, BANGALORE-560 059.

Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR …PETITIONER KHANAM HIGH COURT OF (BY SRI. MANU B.P. ADV.,)

KARNATAKA AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF HOME DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.

3. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY, INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.

4. THE POLICE INSPECTOR GANGAMMANA GUDI POLICE STATION BANGALORE.

5. THE POLICE INSPECTOR BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION BANGALORE-560 091.

6. THE CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH OPPOSITE BRIYAND SQUARE CHURCH COTTONPET, BANGALORE-560053.

7. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KARNATAKA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, 2ND FLOOR M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001.

8. SRI. KAVEESH MAJOR IN AGE WORKING AS PSI AT GANGAMMANAGUDI POLICE STATION BENGALURU.

[AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 24.10.2025]

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP-I WITH SRI. THEJESH P, HCGP FOR R1 TO R7 SRI. D.R. RAVISHANKAR, SR. ADV., FOR SRI. R. ANIL KUMAR, ADV., FOR R8)

THIS W.P.H.C. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER OR DIRECTION OR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT 2 TO 6 TO PRODUCE THE DETUNE I.E., RAVI V S/O VELU, WHO IS IN ILLEGAL CUSTODY OF RESPONDENT 4 BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT FORTHWITH. ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE ORDER, DIRECTION TO RESPONDENT NO.4 TO PRODUCE ALL CCTV PHOTOAGE/RECORDING MAINTAINED BY GANGAMMANA GUDI POLICE STATION IN AND AROUND OF THE POLICE STATION FROM 14.10.2025 TO TILL DATE AND FURTHER DIRECTED THAT GANAGMMANA GUDI POLICE TO PRODUCE VISITOR'S DIARY BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT &

ETC., THIS W.P.H.C. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON

07.01.2026, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER, THIS DAY VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL J., MADE THE FOLLOWING CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

CAV ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the wife of the detenue seeking prayer to set free the detenue by issuing a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus and to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 6 to produce the detenue who is in illegal custody of the respondent No.4, before this Court. The petitioner further prays for an order/direction to the respondent No.4 to produce all CCTV footage/recordings maintained by the Gangammana Gudi police from 14.10.2025 till date.

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of this petition are that on 14.10.2025 at about 9 a.m. the husband of the petitioner left the house to attend his daily work and at about 1 p.m. on the said day, the petitioner's wife received a call and it was informed to her that the detenue has been taken by the CCB Police, Bangalore near the Satellite Bus Stop. It is averred that the petitioner tried to call the detenue but the mobile was switched off and on 15.10.2025, the petitioner visited Byadarahalli Police Station and tried to register a missing complaint. However, the police informed her to visit whenever they make a request. It is further averred that on 16.10.2025, the petitioner was informed that the respondent No.4- police detained her husband and accordingly she visited the police station and met respondent No.8. He facilitated the petitioner to meet the detenue who was in custody. It is also averred that the respondent No.8 demanded Rs.7,00,000/- to release the detenue and thereafter, the petitioner approached the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission'), lodged a complaint against the police atrocities and the official of the Commission visited the police station. The pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top