SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 15867

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
MR N APPANNA – Appellant
Versus
MRS SRIMATHI – Respondent
WP 27709/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 27709 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1. MR N APPANNA S/O LATE A NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 16, 6TH CROSS, CHURCH STREET, HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN., ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed 1. MRS SRIMATHI by SHARADAVANI W/O LATE N.CHIKKAPPANA REDDY, B AGED 61 YEARS, Location: High Court of RESIDING AT NO 70, 4TH CROSS, Karnataka BEML MAIN ROAD, HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560076

2. MR N SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE A NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 83 YEARS, RESIDING AT 1066, CHURCH STREE HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075 MR N KRISHNA REDDY S/O A NARAYANA REDDY, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS, 3. SMT ANUSUYAMMA W/O LATE N KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, 4. MR K BHUVANESHWAR S/O LATE N KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 5. MRS K GEETHA W/O J GOVINDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 6. MRS K ROOPA W/O K VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.4 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE N KRISHNA REDDY, ALL ARERESIDING AT NO 224, 6TH CROSS II MAIN, HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075

7. MR N GUNDAPPA S/O LATE A NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 1289, 1ST CROSS II MAIN, HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075

8. MR N THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE MR A NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 70/1, 4TH CROSS, BEML MAIN ROAD HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075

9. SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O JAYARAMAREDDY, D/O LATE A NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT NO 220/3, PAPAIAH REDDY LANE, HAL, 3RD STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075

10. SMT KALYANAMMA @ RATHNAMMA W/O LATE PAPAIAH REDDY, D/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO 220/2 PAPAIAH REDDY LANE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE 560075

11. SRI VENUGOPAL REDDY H/O LATE SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO 103, MUNEKOLALU VILLAGE, S G R COLLEGE ROAD, NEXT TO OM CAR CARE, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE 560037

12. SMT TULSI V W/O VINOD, D/O LATE SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO C-202 NAGARJUNA SERENE APARTMENT, 9TH MAIN ROAD, CHOWDESHWAI LAYOUT, MARATHAHALLI OPPOSITE TO R J S COLLEGE, BANGALORE 560037

13. SRI HARISH V S/O LATE SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 14. SRI SHASHI V S/O LATE SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.13 AND 14 ARE R/AT NO 103, MUNEKOLALU VILLAGE, S G R COLLEGE ROAD, NEXT TO OM CAR CARE, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE 560037 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHIVANANDA METI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS, QUASHING ORDER DATED 29.08.2025 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XL ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY (CCH-41), IN O.S NO.25917/2007, I.E ANNX-A ON AN APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10 (2) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPCAND TO CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE IA NO. 3/2025 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 IN THE HONBLE TRIAL COURT IN O.S NO. 25917/2007. I.E ANNX-A1 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

This petition by defendant No.4 in O.S.No.25917/2007 is directed against the impugned order dated 29.08.2025 passed by the XL Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge , Bangalore, whereby the application-I.A.No.3/2025 filed by respondent No.1/plaintiff seeking impleadment of proposed defendant Nos.6 to 11 was allowed by the trial Court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the caveator/respondent No.1 and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that respondent No.1/plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit against the petitioner/defendant No.4 and other defendants for partition and separate possession of her alleged share in the suit schedule immovable properties and othe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top