2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 16097
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
SRI MUDDABASAPPA @ T S BASAVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
SRI SANGANABASAPPA – Respondent
RSA 2067/2018
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5028
RSA No. 2067 of 2018
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2067 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUDDABASAPPA @
T.S.BASAVARAJU,
S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA,
R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE,
GULUR HOBLI,
TUMAKURU TALUK & DISTRICT-572118.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
SRI. SANGANABASAPPA,
S/O LATE GURUCHANNABASAPPA,
R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE,
GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TQ.,
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572118.
Location: HIGH …RESPONDENT
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5028
RSA No. 2067 of 2018
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called twice, there is no
representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally
or through video conferencing.
Sri.Sunil Kumar Patel., counsel for the respondent
has appeared through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the
appeal was listed on 18.01.2024, on that day, there was
no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again, the
matter was listed on 30.07.2025, on that day also, there
was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Once
again, the matter was listed on 20.11.2025, on that day
also, there was no representation on behalf of the
appellant. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect
that the appeal is filed in 2018. Now we are in 2026. The
appeal is pending for almost eight years. As already noted
above, when the matter is called, there is no
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5028
RSA No. 2067 of 2018
HC-KAR
representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally
or through video conferencing. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution
SD/-
(JYOTI M)
JUDGE
CH
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22