SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 16097

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
SRI MUDDABASAPPA @ T S BASAVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
SRI SANGANABASAPPA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2067 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

SRI. MUDDABASAPPA @

T.S.BASAVARAJU, S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA, R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK & DISTRICT-572118.

…APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

SRI. SANGANABASAPPA, S/O LATE GURUCHANNABASAPPA, R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TQ., Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572118.

Location: HIGH …RESPONDENT COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL, ADVOCATE)

SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

When the matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing.

Sri.Sunil Kumar Patel., counsel for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing.

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 18.01.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again, the matter was listed on 30.07.2025, on that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top