SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 16097

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
SRI MUDDABASAPPA @ T S BASAVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
SRI SANGANABASAPPA – Respondent
RSA 2067/2018



##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:5028

RSA No. 2067 of 2018

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2067 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

SRI. MUDDABASAPPA @

T.S.BASAVARAJU,

S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA,

R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE,

GULUR HOBLI,

TUMAKURU TALUK & DISTRICT-572118.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

SRI. SANGANABASAPPA,

S/O LATE GURUCHANNABASAPPA,

R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE,

GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TQ.,

Digitally signed by

PREMCHANDRA M R TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572118.

Location: HIGH …RESPONDENT

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

(BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL, ADVOCATE)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER

SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL

HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

##PAGE2##

- 2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:5028

RSA No. 2067 of 2018

HC-KAR

ORAL ORDER

When the matter is called twice, there is no

representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally

or through video conferencing.

Sri.Sunil Kumar Patel., counsel for the respondent

has appeared through video conferencing.

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the

appeal was listed on 18.01.2024, on that day, there was

no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again, the

matter was listed on 30.07.2025, on that day also, there

was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Once

again, the matter was listed on 20.11.2025, on that day

also, there was no representation on behalf of the

appellant. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect

that the appeal is filed in 2018. Now we are in 2026. The

appeal is pending for almost eight years. As already noted

above, when the matter is called, there is no

##PAGE3##

- 3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:5028

RSA No. 2067 of 2018

HC-KAR

representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally

or through video conferencing. Hence, the appeal is

dismissed for non-prosecution

SD/-

(JYOTI M)

JUDGE

CH

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top