THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
SRI MUDDABASAPPA @ T S BASAVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
SRI SANGANABASAPPA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2067 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUDDABASAPPA @
T.S.BASAVARAJU, S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA, R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK & DISTRICT-572118.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
SRI. SANGANABASAPPA, S/O LATE GURUCHANNABASAPPA, R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TQ., Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572118.
Location: HIGH …RESPONDENT COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL, ADVOCATE)
SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing.
Sri.Sunil Kumar Patel., counsel for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 18.01.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again, the matter was listed on 30.07.2025, on that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.