THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT AND K. V. ARAVIND
DR. DYAVAPPA B M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 12804/2024
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6133-DB
WP No. 12804 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION No. 12804 OF 2024 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
1. DR. DYAVAPPA B. M.,
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BELLAHALLI,
VEMAGAL HOBLI,
SANTHEKALLAHALLI POST,
KOLAR-563128.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SAILESH S. KATAREY, ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S AND:
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION,
M. S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALORE-500001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER,
DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE AND
TECHNICAL EDUCATION,
UNNATHA SHIKSHANA SOUDHA,
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6133-DB
WP No. 12804 of 2024
HC-KAR
SHEHADRI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
3. SRI SRINIVASA S.,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
WORKING AS ASSISTANT
PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS,
(UNDER ORDER OF TRANSFER),
GOVERNMENT FIRST GRADE COLLEGE,
CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER OF THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE IN APPLICATION No.3651/2023,
DATED 19.03.2024 AT ANNEXURE-A ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND)
Heard Sri Sailesh S. Katarey, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Smt. B. Sukanya Baliga, learned Additional
Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The unsuccessful applicant in Application No.3651/2023
has preferred the present petition challenging the order dated
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6133-DB
WP No. 12804 of 2024
HC-KAR
19.03.2024 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative
Tribunal, Bengaluru (for short, “the Tribunal”).
3. The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Professor of
Physics and was posted to the Government College for Women,
Kolar. He continued in the said post from the date of his
appointment until transfers were effected pursuant to the
Karnataka Civil Services (Regulation of Transfer of Teaching
Staff of the Department of Collegiate Education) Rules, 2021
(for short, “the Rules, 2021”), notified on 29.01.2021.
3.1 Under the Rules, 2021, transfers were to be effected
through counseling. When counseling was conducted based on
seniority, the petitioner opted for Government College for Boys,
Kolar, against a vacant post. It is stated that the Counselling
Committee did not permit him to select the said post and
instead transferred him to the Government First Grade College,
Chikkaballapura.
3.2 Aggrieved by the denial of his selection to the post at
Government College for Boys, Kolar, the petitioner preferred an
application before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, after taking note
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6133-DB
WP No. 12804 of 2024
HC-KAR
of the Government Order dated 27.07.2023, which restricted
selection of a college in the same place, dismissed the
application.
4. Sri Sailesh S. Katarey, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, submits that the petitioner has been serving as an
Assistant Professor of Physics at the Government College for
Women, Kolar, for the past 14 years. He further submits that
the petitioner is suffering from Lymphadenitis (Tuberculosis)
and requires continuous treatment at R.L. Jalappa Hospital,
Kolar, at intervals of every 15 days. It is contended that, when
a vacant post was available at Government College for Boys,
Kolar, denial of the option to select the said post is in violation
of Rules 2(e) and 2(q) of the Rules, 2021.
4.1 Learned counsel submits that Rules 2(e) and 2(q) do not
impose any restriction on opting for a posting in another college
situated in the same place. It is further contended that a
Government Order cannot introduce a restriction which is not
contemplated under the Rules. Learned counsel, without
preju
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.