##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:5529

WP No. 1757 of 2026

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31^ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

WRIT PETITION NO. 1757 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)

BETWEEN:

M/S SHAKTHI PRINTTECH

BY ITS PROP. SRI. SARAVANAN V N,

S/O SRI V NARAYANMURTHY,

AGED 45 YEARS,

NO.16, 3RD AND 5TH CROSS,

2ND MAIN ROAD,

RAMACHANDRAPURAM,

BANGALORE-560021

…PETITIONER

Digitally

sign ed by (BY SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU., ADV.)

SUNITHA K S

Location: AND:

HIGH COU RT

OF

CANARA BANK

KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS

AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER,

REGIONAL OFFICE WEST,

CANARA BANK CHITRAPUR MUTT COMPLEX,

MALLESWARAM, 15TH CROSS,

BANGALORE-560055

…RESPONDENT

- 2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:5529

WP No. 1757 of 2026

HC-KAR

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE

226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE SALE

NOTICE ISSUED BY THE NO. REF.RESPONDENT BANK DATED

09/12/2025 BEARING ARMII/SN/01/2025-26 PRODUCED AT

ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTIESAND ALL

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, IN THE

INTEREST OF JUSTICE, EQUITY AND LAW, GRANT AN INTERIM

ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE SALE NOTICE

ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK DATED 09/12/2025

BEARING NO. REF. ARMII/SN/01/2025-26 PRODUCED AT

ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ITS

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND

EQUITY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

***

- 3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:5529

WP No. 1757 of 2026

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging

the sale notice dated 09.12.2025. The petitioner has an

equal efficacious remedy. The petitioner without

exhausting efficacious remedy, has filed this writ petition.

2. In view of proposition of law laid down by the

Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of RIKHAB CHAND JAIN VS

UNION OF INDIA IN C.A.NO.6719 OF 2012 disposed off on

12.11.2025, the writ petition is not maintainable.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

not maintainable.

4. A liberty is reserved to the petitioner to

challenge the sale notice before the appropriate forum.

Sd/-

(ASHOK S.KINAGI)

JUDGE

SSB