2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 16786
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
SMT. SHARADAMMA. N. – Appellant
Versus
Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike – Respondent
WP 7285/2023
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5509
WP No. 7285 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 7285 OF 2023 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHARADAMMA. N.
62 YEARS
W/O SRI. BALAKRISHNA MURTHY H.D.
NO.409, 3RD CROSS,
MUNIYAPPA LAYOUT,
MARUTHI NAGARA,
R M V 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560094.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
HEAD OFFICE OF THE BBMP,
CORPORATION CIRCLE,
BANGALORE - 560002
Digitally signed REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVEND RA
Location: HIGH 2. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER,
COURT OF THE OFFICE OF THE BBMP,
KARNATAKA
YELAHANKA SUB-DIVISION,
YELAHANKA OLD TOWN,
BENGALURU - 560064.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAMU S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT DATED 21.03.2022 BEARING
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5509
WP No. 7285 of 2023
HC-KAR
NO.BBMP/YA.VA/KTR/422 2021-22 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-2
VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the
following reliefs:-
i. "May kindly quash the Endorsement dated
21/03/2022 bearing No.BBMP/Ya.Va/KTR/422 2021-
22 issued by the respondent-2 vide Annexure-A
and
ii. May kindly issue a writ of
mandamus/Order/Direction to the respondents to
issue Khatha Certificate in favour of the petitioner
for her property and
iii. May kindly issue any other appropriate order or
direction or writ in favour of the petitioner, the
Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the fact and
circumstances of the present case, in the interest of
justice and equity."
2. The contention of the petitioner is that site bearing No.84
having Assessment No.630/2 measuring 40x60 sq.ft.
totally 2,400 sq.ft. situated at Maruthi Nagara, 2nd
Division, Kogilu Road coming under the Yelahanka Town
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5509
WP No. 7285 of 2023
HC-KAR
Muncipality. The said property belongs to
Smt.R.Jayamma, who sold a portion of the property
measuring 30x40 feet to Sri.Venkatesha and
Smt.Nagalakshmi and the remaining property measuring
30 x 40 to the petitioner on 15.10.2007.
3. The petitioner applied for issuance of khatha in respect of
the said property. The petitioner having made payment
of the applicable taxes in respect of the same, post the
purchase, the said application was not considered. As
such, the petitioner filed W.P.No.57/2019 whereunder,
this Court had remitted the matter to the respondents -
BBMP to reconsider the matter afresh after obtaining all
necessary documents from the hands of the petitioner.
4. The petitioner claims that all the documents have been
submitted. The respondents once again on 21.03.2022
issued endorsement that no khatha can be issued to the
petitioner without a layout plan sanction from the BDA
being produced and payment of betterment charges of
Rs.250/-. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before
this Court.
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:5509
WP No. 7285 of 2023
HC-KAR
5. The submission of Sri.Chandraiah, learned counsel for the
petitioner is that there being no layout plan sanction, the
petitioner would not be in a position to produce the same.
But however, the petitioner would make payment of
betterment charges of Rs.250/- as sought for.
6. Sri.Ramu S., learned counsel for the respondents submits
that if betterment charges are paid, the respondents
would consider and issue khatha in respect of the
property of the petitioner, as per the applicable rules.
7. The said submission answers the grievance of the
petitioner. In that view of the matter, I pass the
following:-
ORDER
i. The writ petition is partly allowed
ii. The Endorsement dated 21.03.2022 at Annexure -
A is quashed.
iii. Respondents are directed to consider and issue
khatha in respect of property of the petitioner after
collecting the betterment charges of Rs.250/-.
##PAGE5##- 5 -
NC: