THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
C YOGESH – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF – Respondent
WP 10377/2026
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:18123 WP NO.10377 OF 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.10377 OF 2026 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN: C. YOGESH
S/O D. CHANDRASHEKARAN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/AT SHARADA NIVASA NO.33, G.NO.16TH STREET, JOGUPALYA,
HALASURU, BENGALURU - 560 008.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKESH B. BHATT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA FEDERAL CO-OPERATIVE LTD.,
SAUHARDHA SAHAKARI SAUDHA, Digitally signed by NO.68, 18TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, CHAYA S A
MALLESHWARAM, Location: H IGH COURT OF BENGALURU - 560 055.
KARNATAKA
2. RECOVERY OFFICER (RULE-441) AND ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES, KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA FEDERAL
CO-OPERATIVE LTD., SAUHARDHA SAHAKARI SAUDHA, NO.68, 18TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD,
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 055.
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:18123 WP NO.10377 OF 2026
HC-KAR
3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SAMRUDHA SAUHARDHA CREDIT
CO-OPERATIVE LTD., NO 518/A, 3RD MAIN ROAD, BANASHANKARI 1ST STAGE,
SRINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 050.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE DATED 15TH MARCH, 2026 PUBLISHED IN NEWS PAPER VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND THE AUCTION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED
27TH FEBRUARY, 2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-L; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, learned Additional Government
Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the Auction Notice dated 15th March, 2026 (Annexure-K) issued by the respondent No.3 published in newspaper and Auction Notice dated 27th February, 2026 (Annexure-L) issued by the
respondent No.3.
3. Heard Sri. Rakesh B. Bhatt, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, learned
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:18123 WP NO.10377 OF 2026
HC-KAR
Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1
and 2.
4. Having taken note of the submission made by
learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the Auction Notice has been issued pursuant to the award passed by the competent authority and the said award has not been challenged by the petitioner before the competent authority, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in this petition. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority by challenging the award,
writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
(E.S. INDIRESH)
JUDGE
ARK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.