SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18278

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
SUBBAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. BHAGAVATHAMMA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1854 OF 2013 (PAR)

BETWEEN: SUBBAMMA W/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BATLAHALLI VILAGE, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125.

APPELLANT (BY SRI. S.A. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SMT. BHAGAVATHAMMA W/O SEENAPPA, Dig itally AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, signed by CHAYA S A

2. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA Location:

HIGH W/O HANUMANTHU, COURT OF AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, KARNATAKA

3. KRISHNAPPA S/O SEENAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 RESIDING AT BATLAHALLI VILLAGE, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125.

4. M. VENKATARAVANAPPA S/O LATE MADDIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 5. N. SRINIVASA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 6. BHARATHI W/O PRASAD P.S.

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT SOMUKALAHALLI VILLAGE, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. IMRAN PASHA, ADVOCATE FOR R3;

R1, R2, R4, R5 AND R6 - SERVED)

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.04.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.32/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top