SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18324

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI S.P – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WP 16661/2022



##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:18412 WP No. 16661 of 2022

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 16661 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI S.P., W/O S.P.SUDHAKAR

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/A NO.84, 4TH CROSS

GANDHINAGARA HARIHARA - 577 001

DAVANGERE DISTRICT

2. SMT.REKHA W/O.NAMADEVA M.B.,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NEELAKANTANAGAR

4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN HARIHARA-577 001

DAVANAGERE DISTRICT …PETITIONERS Digitally signed by

(BY SRI. V.B.SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)

SUVARNA T L H o I c G a H ti o C n O :

UR T OF AND:

KARNATAKA

1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANGERE DISTRICT AND

APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND

WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS

DAVANGERE, HARIHAR ROAD (SH - 76)

DAVANGERE - 577 001

##PAGE2##

- 2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:18412 WP No. 16661 of 2022

HC-KAR

2. THE TRIBUNAL OF MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND

SENIOR CITIZENS AND THE ASST. COMMISSIONER AND

THE SUB -DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SAGARA- SUB DIVISION

COURT ROAD SAGARA – 577 401

SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT

3. SRI R.SURESH S/O LATE BABU RAO

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

4. SMT.USHA W/O R.SURESH

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R3 & R4 ARE R/A NEAR

SWAGATH MEDICALS, BUS STAND ROAD SHIKARIPURA - 577 427 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT

5. SMT.DRAKSHAYANAMMA W/O GIRIRAJ K.N.,

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/O 2ND CROSS,

NEAR BEERALINGESHWARA TEMPLE NEAR VINAKAYAKA NAGARA

SHIKARIPURA - 577 427 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2

SMT.NIREEKHA D.J., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SHOWRI H.R., ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4

R5- SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 18.7.2022 IN CASE BEARING NO.MAG(11)HI NAA/10/202-23 PASSED BY THE R-1 THE

##PAGE3##

- 3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:18412 WP No. 16661 of 2022

HC-KAR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SR CITIZENS DAVANAGARERE HARIHARA ROAD(SH-76) DAVANAGERE VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPEAL FILED BY THE

PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE-E.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed seeking the following

prayer:

"PRAYER WHEREFORE, the Petitioners, above-named, humbly

pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to:

[a] Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ or order or orders to set aside the Order, dated: 18.07.2022, in case bearing No.MAG (1)/ Hi Naa/10/2022-23, passed by the 1st Respondent, the Deputy Commissioner, Davanagere District & Appellate Authority for the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Davanagere- Harihar Road (SH-76), Davanagere, vide Annexure - F and consequently allow the appeal filed by

the Petitioners, vide Annexure-E.

[b] to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and in the circumstances of the case by allowing the above Writ

Petition, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. The facts of the case are that respondent Nos.3 and 4

are senior citizens who are issueless. The petitioners are none other than the 3rd respondent's sister's children. It is the case

##PAGE4##

- 4 -

NC: 2026:KHC:18412 WP No. 16661 of 2022

HC-KAR

of respondent Nos.3 and 4 that the petitioners fraudulently pressed into service a Release Deed and by virtue of the same, when the respondents are being evicted from the premises, they have approached respondent No.2 and respondent No.2 has set aside the Release Deed by order dated 29.04.2022. Against that, the petitioners had filed an appeal before respondent No.1 and respondent No.1 has affirmed the order of

respondent No.2.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits

that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have no such authority to cancel the Release Deed. It is submitted that the Deed is executed after accepting the consideration. The respondent Nos.3 and 4 havin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top