SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18795

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G.S. KAMAL
PARAMESHWARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.318 OF 2026 (U/S 14(A) (2))

BETWEEN:

1. PARAMESHWARAPPA, S/O LATE CHENNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 2. ARUNA, S/O PARAMESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 3. NAVEEN, S/O MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, R/O MADIKE CHILUR VILLAGE, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT.

Digitally signed …APPELLANTS by SUMA B N (BY SRI. PRASAD B S.,ADVOCATE)

Location: H IGH COURT OF AND:

KARNATAKA

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY RURAL POLICE STATION, SHIVAMOGGA, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. YASHAVANTH S., S/O SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/O KORACHARA KERI, HADONAHALLI VILLAGE, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1;

SRI. MOHAN KUMAR T., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.02.2026 PASSED IN CRL.MISC NO.71/2026 WHEREBY THE APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL OF THE APPELLANTS HAS BEEN REJECTED. B. ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN TH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top