SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 19616

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P SREE SUDHA
THE MANAGER ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SRI. MOHAMMED SHARFUDDEN – Respondent
MFA 8839/2025



##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:16504 MFA No. 8839 of 2025

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8839 OF 2025(MV-D)

BETWEEN:

THE MANAGER, ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL

INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE:133, 3RD FLOOR,

SHIKA TOWERS, RAMAVILAS ROAD, MYSURU - 570 024.

REPRESENTED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: NO.30, 3RD FLOOR, JNR CITY CENTRE,

RAJARAM MOHAN ROY ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMA NAGAR,

BENGALURU - 560 027.

…APPELLANT Digitally signed (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S SAMPRATHI., ADVOCATE)

by PADMASHREE AND:

SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of 1. SRI. MOHAMMED SHARFUDDEN,

Karnataka S/O SUGUMARN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

RESIDING AT KALASESHWARA NAGARA, MAVANAKERE VILLAGE,

KALASA POST AND VILLAGE, NOW KALASA TALUK (MUDIGERE),

CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.

##PAGE2##

- 2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:16504 MFA No. 8839 of 2025

HC-KAR

2. SMT. SHARIFA, W/O MOHAMMED SHARFUDDEN,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALASESHWARA NAGARA,

MAVANAKERE VILLAGE, KALASA POST AND VILLAGE,

NOW KALASA TALUK (MUDIGERE), CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.

3. SRI. HARISH K.N., S/O NAGESH ACHARI B.G.,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT BETTUVALLI

KALAKODU VILLAGE, SAMSE, KALASA HOBLI, MUDIGERE TALUK,

(NOW KALASA TALUK), CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.

4. SRI. NAGESH ACHARI B.G., S/O LATE GOVINDACHAR,

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT BETTUVALLI

KALAKODU VILLAGE, SAMSE, KALASA HOBLI, MUDIGERE TALUK,

(NOW KALASA TALUK), CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R2 SERVED;

NOTICE TO R3 AND R4 DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 05.12.2025)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.09.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.133/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND

##PAGE3##

- 3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:16504 MFA No. 8839 of 2025

HC-KAR

JMFC, MACT, MUDIGERE, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.17,16,715/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL AMOUNT IS DEPOSITED WITH THE

TRIBUNAL.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellant-Insurance company

under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging judgment and award dated 02.09.2025 passed in MVC No.133/2022 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, MACT, Mudigere, awarding the compensation of Rs.17,16,715/- with

interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till its realization.

2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the

appellant. Notice to respondents No.3 and 4 is dispensed with vide order dated 5.12.2025. Notice though served to respondents No.1 and 2 they did not turn up therefore

proceeded exparte.

##PAGE4##

- 4 -

NC: 2026:KHC:16504 MFA No. 8839 of 2025

HC-KAR

3. Brief facts of the case are that, one Kum.Nafeeza,

met with an accident on 31.01.2022 and subsequently died. Her parents filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- along with interest. The tribunal considering the entire oral and documentary evidence on record awarded global compensation of Rs.17,16,715/- with interest rate of 6%

per annum from date of petition till realization.

4. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant-

insurance company preferred this appeal contending that the deceased was a minor girl aged about 9 years and Tribunal by relying on the decision of this Court in MFAC No.11440/2011 c/w MFA No.206/2018 between Kalshiminarayanapp @ Moogappa, vs. M/s Royal Sundaram Allianz Ins. Co. Ltd, and Others, disposed of on 12.9.2024, granted global compensation

of Rs.17,16,715/- without assigning any reasons.

5. Though no reasoning was given by the Tribunal,

considering the age of the child, the Tribunal has taken the notional income as per the recent citation and granted global compensation of Rs.17,16,715/-, and this Court finds no reason

to interfere with the Judgment and award by the Tribunal.

##PAGE5##

- 5 -

NC: 2026:KHC:16504 MFA No. 8839 of 2025

HC-KAR

6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

7. Amount already deposited by the ins

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top