SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 19641

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.Nagaprasanna, J
Siddanayaka K – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
WP No. 3771 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Akash B Shetty
For the Respondents: Soumya R

An offence of bribery under Section 171E of the IPC requires the presence of the essential ingredients of Section 171B, notably the exchange of gratification to induce or reward the exercise of electoral rights; mere possession of money without proof of such intent or transaction does not constitute an offence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 171E and 171B - Bribery - Quashing of proceedings - Mere possession of cash without evidence of distribution or intent to induce exercise of electoral rights does not attract the ingredients of bribery - Absence of essential elements under Section 171B makes Section 171E inapplicable - Criminal proceedings initiated based on such lack of evidence are unsustainable.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner faced criminal proceedings for an alleged offence under Section 171E of the IPC after the flying squad seized a sum of Rs. 50,00,000 during a search of the petitioner’s land. A FIR was registered, and a charge sheet was filed, which the petitioner challenged in this writ petition by seeking the quashing of all related proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court held that for an offence of bribery to be made out, there must be a giver and a receiver, or an offer of gratification with the specific intent to induce or reward the exercise of an electoral right. Mere recovery of cash in a bag, without evidence of distribution or interaction with electors, does not fulfill the legal requirements of Section 171B and, consequently, Section 171E. The court observed that the proceedings were unsustainable and liable to be quashed.

Issues: Whether the mere possession of a large sum of money during an election period fulfills the ingredients of the offence of bribery under Section 171E read with Section 171B of the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The legal requirement for the offence of bribery necessitates the presence of two parties, one giving and one accepting or being offered gratification with the intent to influence electoral rights; in the absence of such evidence, the criminal proceedings cannot proceed.

Result: Writ Petition allowed; proceedings quashed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the petition, case facts, and the nature of the allegation of bribery during election periods. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. analysis of section 171e and 171b of the ipc, confirming that possession of cash without evidence of inducement is insufficient for a bribery charge. (Para 4)
3. formal court order quashing the criminal proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO :

A) DIRECT BY QUASHING THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND FIR REGISTERED BY THE H.D KOTE POLICE IN CRIME NO.0156/2023 DATED 10/05/2023 AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 171E OF INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC), 1860, BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, MYSORE DISTRICT, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B.

B) DIRECT QUASHING THE CHARGE SHEET NO. 224/2023 DATED 10/09/2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE BEFORE THE HON’BLE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, H.D KOTE, MYSORE DISTRICT, FOR THE OFFENSES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 171E OF INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC), 1860 AGAINST THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC;

C) TO DIRECT QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.623 OF 2023 PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, H.D KOTE, MYSORE DISTRICT, VIDE ANNEXURE ‘D’ (ORDER SHEET IN CRIME NO.156 OF 2023 WAS CONTINUED WITH CC NO.623 OF 2023)

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

(a) “to direct by quashing the complaint filed by respondent No.2 and FIR registered by the H.D Kote police in Crime No.0156 of 2023 dated 10/05/2023 against the petitioner for the alleged offence punishable under Section 171E of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, before the Hon’ble Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Mysore District, vide Annexure-A and B;

(b) to direct quashing the charge sheet No.224/2023 dated 10/09/2023 filed by the respondent police before the Hon’ble Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, H.D Kote, Mysore District, for the offenses punishable under Section 171E of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 against the petitioner vide Annexure-C and etc;

(c) to direct quashing the entire proceedings in CC No.623 of 2023 pending before the Hon’ble Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, H.D Kote, Mysore District, vide Annexure ‘D’ (order sheet in Crime No.156 of 2023 was continued with CC No.623 of 2023)”

2. Heard the learned counsel Sri. Akash B. Shetty, appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader Smt. Soumya R. appearing for the respondents.

3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:

The 2nd respondent was a member of the Flying Squad Team for the Karnataka Assembly General Election 2023. On 09-05-2023, the 2nd respondent and his team conduct a search on the land belonging to the petitioner. During the search, a bag containing cash in multiple denominations of Rs.500, Rs.200 and Rs.100, amounting to a total of Rs.50,00,000/- is found. A complaint is thus registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 171E of the IPC. The 1st respondent/jurisdictional Police register a non-cognizable report in NCR No.288/2023 and present the same before the learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate, on presentation of the non-cognizable report, permits registration of the crime in terms of Section 155(2) of the Cr.P.C. A crime is then registered in Crime No.156/2023 for the aforesaid offence. The police conduct investigation and file a chargesheet in C.C. No.623/2023. The filing of the chargesheet is what has driven the petitioner to this Court in the subject petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the issue in the lis stands completely answered by the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of M. MALURU ES EN KRISHNAIAH SETTY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA12025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top