THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
MRS B CHAMUNDI BUVANESWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 11114/2025
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:16873 WP No. 11114 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 11114 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. MRS. B. CHAMUNDI BUVANESWARI W/O. MR.M. BALASUBRAMANIAM,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.15, 2ND MAIN ROAD, BINNY LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, BANGALORE-560 040
2. MR. M BALASUBRAMANIAM, S/O. LATE MR. MARUTHA CHETTIAR,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, BANGALORE-560 040.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ROHIT RAJKUMAR KUKREJA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF
KARNATAKA 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560001
2. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, VIJAYANAGAR BRANCH (07985), NO.2, 5TH MAIN, CHBHS, 1ST LAYOUT,
NEAR BDA COMPLEX, GOVINDRAJ NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560040.
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:16873 WP No. 11114 of 2025
HC-KAR
3. SMT. SRISUBHASHINI, W/O. VIKRAM SRIKANTH B.,
D/O. MR. SHANMUGASUNDARAM, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2/2 NRS NAGAR, NARASIMHANAICKEN PALAYAM,
COIMBATORE- 641 031 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, AGA FOR R1;
SMT. SADANA S DESAI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN KUMAR H.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO FORTHWITH INITIATE THE BREAK-OPEN PROCEDURE FOR THE PETITIONERS LOCKER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE BANKING REGULATIONS AND FACILITATE ITS FORMAL CLOSURE, THEREBY GRANTING THE
PETITIONERS ACCESS TO THEIR LAWFUL PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
Captioned petition is filed seeking following reliefs:-
"a) Issue an appropriate writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondent No.2 to forthwith initiate the break-open procedure for the Petitioners' locker in accordance with the applicable banking regulations and facilitate its formal closure, thereby granting the Petitioners access to their lawful
property;
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:16873 WP No. 11114 of 2025
HC-KAR
b) Direct the Respondent No.2 to prepare an inventory of the locker's contents in the presence of authorized Bank officials and an independent neutral
party, ensuring compliance with procedural safeguards;
c) Direct the Respondent No.2 to furnish the locker usage ledger from the year 2016 till date, ensuring that the Respondent No.2 is maintaining proper and correct
records.
d) Direct the Respondent No.2 to compensate the Petitioners for the mental agony, harassment, and financial loss suffered due to the Bank's arbitrary and illegal conduct by awarding damages of ₹50,000 (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) or such other amount as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the interest of justice;
e) Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case
in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The petitioners, who are the parents-in-law of
respondent No.3 (daughter-in-law), have approached this Court alleging inaction on the part of respondent No.2– Bank. Their grievance is that, despite repeated requests, the Bank has neither permitted the locker to be broken open in accordance with due procedure nor facilitated access to its contents by preparing an inventory in the
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:16873 WP No. 11114 of 2025
HC-KAR
presence of authorised officials and an independent neutral witness. The petitioners are further aggrieved by the failure of the Bank to furnish the locker
operation/usage ledger from the year 2016 till date.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners, the learned counsel for respondent No.2– Bank, the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, and the learned counsel appearing for respondent
No.3.
4. A perusal of the records indicates that there
ex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.