SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 19995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


NC: 2026:KHC:17120-DB


CRL.A No. 1098 of 2018


C/W CRL.A No. 880 of 2018


CRL.A No. 1188 of 2018


DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026


PRESENT


THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ


AND


THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T



CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1098 OF 2018 (C)


CONNECTED WITH


CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.880 OF 2018 (C)


AND


CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1188 OF 2018 (C)


IN CRL.A. NO.1098/2018:


BETWEEN:


NAZRU KHAN @ NAZRU


S/O. ISMAIL KHAN


AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS


OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST


RESIDENT OF KADEKAL VILLAGE


SHIVAMOGGA TALUK-577 201


(UNDERGOING SENTENCE).


…APPELLANT


(BY SRI SHIVARAJ N. ARALI, ADVOCATE)


AND:


THE STATE BY TUNGANAGAR POLICE


SHIVAMOGGA


REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA


BENGALURU-560 001.


…RESPONDENT


(BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR MAJAGE, S.P.P-II ALONG WITH


SRI RAHUL RAI K., H.C.G.P.)


IN CRL.A. NO.880/2018:


BETWEEN:


1. SRI ABID KHAN


S/O. MUNAWAR KHAN


AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS


COOLIE.


2. SRI KHALANDAR @ MUNNA


S/O. ABDUL THOUFEEQ


AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS


FRUIT MERCHANT.


BOTH ARE RESIDING AT


KADEKAL VILLAGE


SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT-577 201.


...APPELLANTS


(BY SRI MOHAMED IBRAHIM, ADVOCATE)


AND:


STATE OF KARNATAKA


BY THE SHO OF TUNGANAGAR POLICE STATION


SHIVAMOGGA


REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLC PROSECUTOR


BENGALURU-01.


...RESPONDENT


(BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR MAJAGE, S.P.P-II ALONG WITH


SRI RAHUL RAI K., H.C.G.P.)


IN CRL.A. NO.1188/2018:


BETWEEN:


MR. MUJAHID


S/O. BASHEER KHAN


AGED 39 YEARS


KADEKAL VILLAGE


SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT.


...APPELLANT


(BY SRI RANGANATH REDDY R., ADVOCATE)


AND:


THE STATE OF KARNATAKA


BY THUNGANAGAR POLICE STATION


SHIVAMOGGA, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P.


HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA


BENGALURU-01.


...RESPONDENT


(BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR MAJAGE, S.P.P-II ALONG WITH


SRI RAHUL RAI K., H.C.G.P.)

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shivaraj N. Arali, Mohamed Ibrahim, Ranganath Reddy R.
For the Respondents: Vijaya Kumar Majage, Rahul Rai K.

A conviction based on the testimony of a sole eyewitness cannot be sustained if the evidence suffers from material contradictions, omissions, and improvements, and when the associated Test Identification Parade is conducted with unexplained delays and procedural lapses, failing to inspire the confidence of the court.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302, 397 and 34 - Conviction based on sole eyewitness - Sufficiency of evidence - Reliability of witness testimony - Test Identification Parade procedure - Delay in conducting TIP - Admissibility and evidentiary value of recovery. (Paras 12, 23, 26, 33)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Appeal - Scope of appellate intervention - Duty of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Impact of material contradictions, omissions, and improvements in testimony on conviction. (Paras 33)

Facts of the case:
The prosecution alleged that the four appellants conspired to rob and murder a manager and field trainee of a microfinance company. The victims were allegedly waylaid on a forest road; one was assaulted, leading to a fatal motorcycle crash into a tree. The appellants were charged with robbery and murder. The trial court convicted them, which the appellants challenged on grounds of unreliable evidence, inconsistent witness testimony, and flawed identification procedures.

Findings of Court:
The oral testimony of the sole eyewitness was riddled with significant contradictions and improvements compared to the initial FIR. The Test Identification Parade (TIP) was conducted over a month after arrest without adequate explanation for the delay, and the identification process was compromised because the faces of the accused were reportedly covered during the incident. Prosecution evidence regarding conspiracy and recovery of alleged stolen items was also found unconvincing.

Issues: Whether the conviction for murder and robbery based on the testimony of a single eyewitness and contested identification parade could be sustained in view of the contradictions and procedural lapses.

Ratio Decidendi: A conviction relying on the testimony of a sole witness requires the evidence to be trustworthy and free of material contradictions. Where a TIP is conducted belatedly and in a manner that undermines the credibility of the identification process, and where conspiracy and recovery evidence remain unproven, the conviction cannot be sustained.

Result: Appeals allowed; the trial court's judgment of conviction and order on sentence were set aside, and the appellants were acquitted.

THESE CRIMINAL APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)

The judgment and order passed in Sessions Case No.268 of 2014 by the Court of II Additional District and Sessions, Shivamogga, convicting and sentencing the appellants/accused Nos.1 to 4 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 397 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'IPC') is assailed in these appeals.

2. Criminal Appeal No.880 of 2018 is preferred by accused Nos.1 and 2, Criminal Appeal No.1188 of 2018 is preferred by accused No.3, and Criminal Appeal No.1098 of 2018 is preferred by accused No.4.

3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants/accused Nos.1 to 4, the learned State Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State and perused the evidence on record.

4. It is the case of prosecution that on 27.08.2009 at about 8.20 a.m., when the first informant, Malappa (PW3), and Sharana Basava (deceased) were proceeding on a motorcycle, bearing Registration No.KA-15 K-4356, on Yaraganalu Forest Road within the jurisdiction of Tunganagar Police Station, Shivamogga, accused Nos.1 to 4, who had conspired to commit robbery and waiting for the victims, armed with longs and clubs, assaulted Sharana Basava, who was riding the motorcycle, with a club on his face, due to which, he sustained grievous injuries and lost control of the motorcycle and hit a tree and sustained head injuries and succumbed to the injuries at the spot. Further, the accused robbed a bag containing a sum of Rs.1,16,655/- and four Nokia mobile sets from the complainant and thereby, committed the charged offences.

5. The first informant, Malappa (PW3), was working as a Field Assistant Trainee and deceased Sharana Basava was working as a Manager in one SKS Micro Finance Private Limited, Shivamogga. On 27.08.2009 at about 6.45 a.m., they collected a sum of Rs.1,16,655/- and four Nokia mobile sets from PW8-Sabanna (CW11), Branch Manager of SKS Micro Finance Private Limited, in order to distribute the same to the members and thereafter, they were proceeding on the motorcycle, bearing Registration No.KA-15 K-4356, towards Kadekal Village through Lakkinakoppa Circle. It is the case of prosecution that accused Nos.1 to 4, who had conspired to commit robbery, were waiting near the forest road of Yaraganalu to rob the money. Accused No.3 passed on the information about the arrival of the victims, accused Nos.1, 2 and 4, who were armed with longs and clubs, waylaid the motorcycle and accused No.1 tried to assault the deceased who was riding the motorcycle, and when the deceased took the motorcycle to the left side of the road, accused No.2 assaulted on his face with a club, due to which, he lost control and hit a tree and sustained severe head injuries and died at the spot. Further, accused No.4 assaulted the first informant (PW3) with a club on the chest and caused injuries to him and then, robbed the bag containing a cash of Rs.1,16,655/- and four Nokia mobile sets. Immediately, after the incident, PW3 ran towards Kadekal Village and informed the matter to the villagers, whom he met, and from the coin booth, he informed the matter to his Office. PW34-Sub-Inspector of Police, who got the information about the incident, came to the spot and recorded the statement of PW3 as per Ex.P8 at the spot, on the basis of which, an F.I.R. was registered against two unknown persons.

6. PW34 handed over the investigation to PW27-Circle Inspector of Police, who conducted the spot mahazar-Ex.P6 and from the spot, seized a motorcycle, one club, two helmets, two chappal, one jerkin, one gutka packet, one beedi packet, sample mud and bloodstained mud. The dead body was shifted to the hospital, wherein inquest mahazar-Ex.P1 was conducted. Post-mortem examination was conducted by PW33.

7. PW28-Invest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top