SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 20006

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H T NARENDRA PRASAD
S MURARI – Appellant
Versus
R SUNIL KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4365 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

S MURARI S/O T M SADANANDAM AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT NO. 3, ANAND HABITAT ARTILLERY ROAD, ULSOOR BENGALURU - 560 008.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. R SUNIL KUMAR S/O A RAJMAL AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

2. R LALITH KUMAR S/O A RAJMAL Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIG H 3. HARSHA JAIN COURTOF W/O R LALITH KUMAR KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 270, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU 560 051.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH SHETTY B., ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY APPROPRIATE WRIT SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 04.02.2026 (ANNEXURE-

A) IN ADJOURNING THE MATTER TO THE EXTENT OF NOT GRANTING AD INTERIM ORDER ON THE IA NO.2 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC RESTRAINING THE DEFENDANTS OR ANYBODY CLAIMING UNDER THEM FROM CREATING 3RD PARTY INTEREST, PENDING BEFORE THE XIII ADDL. CIT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top