THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SMT. K. LALITHA – Appellant
Versus
HANUMANTHNAGARA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Respondent
WP 7820/2024
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:17061 WP No. 7820 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 7820 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. K. LALITHA W/O SRI. K. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 248, 6TH MAIN,
4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 011.
2. SRI. NAVEEN KRISHNA B S/O SRI. BALAKRISHNA K,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 151/2, 26TH CROSS,
Digitally signed by 6TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, SHARADAVANI B
Location: High BANGALORE - 560 081.
Court of Karnataka
THE SECOND PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER,
SRI. K. LAKSHMINARASIMHA MURTHY.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MARILINGE GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:17061 WP No. 7820 of 2024
HC-KAR AND:
HANUMANTHNAGARA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REGISTERED UNDER THE
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1904, NO. 7/29, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 019,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. DEVARAJA A, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO RETURN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONERS AT THE TIME OF BORROWING THE LOAN. SINCE THE PETITIONERS ARE READY AND WILLING TO PAY THE LOAN AMOUNT AS PER THE DEMAND LETTER DTD 08.08.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-T AND
ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:17061 WP No. 7820 of 2024
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
The captioned petition is filed seeking direction
against the respondent/co-operative society to accept the
balance loan dues and return the original documents. 2. The petition is stoutly opposed by the learned
counsel appearing for the respondent on two principal grounds. Firstly, it is contended that the respondent being a co-operative society registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, does not answer the description of “State” or “other authority” within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus is not maintainable against such a private body. Secondly, it is urged that the secured asset mortgaged by the petitioners has already been brought to sale in a public auction conducted on 11.03.2026 and the auction proceedings having been concluded, the relief sought in the writ
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:17061 WP No. 7820 of 2024
HC-KAR
petition has become infructuous and cannot be granted at
this stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
parties. Perused the pleadings and the material placed on
record.
4. Having given anxious consideration to the rival
submissions, this Court finds considerable force in the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent as to the maintainability of the writ petition. It is a well-settled principle of law that a writ in the nature of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would lie only against the State or its instrumentalities or against such bodies which discharge public duties or statutory functions having a public element. A co- operative society registered under the Karnataka Co- operative Societies Act, 1959, in the absence of any material to demonstrate that it is either controlled by the State or discharging any public duty, remains essentially a
##PAGE5##- 5 -
NC: 2026:KHC:17061 WP No. 7820 of 2024
HC-KAR
private body. In such circumstances, no writ of mandamus can be issued to compel performance of obligations which are purely contractual or arise out of private law remedies. The petitioners have not placed any material to bring the respondent within the ambit of Article 12 or to establish that the respondent is discharging any public function so as to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.