Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. Manmadha Rao, J
Vasuki Murali – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Sridhar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural history and factual background of the custody disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 2. arguments regarding child custody welfare and pre-litigation mediation disclosure. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court's discretion in interim injunctions and mediation confidentiality mandates. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. principles for balanced visitation rights and non-interference in discretionary orders. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03.02.2026 PASSED ON I.A. NO. II AND I.A. NO. VI IN G AND WC NO.477/2025 BY THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A HERETO AND QUASHING, ALLOW I.A. NO. II (ANNEXURE-C) FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN G AND WC NO. 477/2025 UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC R/W SECTION 10 OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984, BY GRANTING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT, HIS FAMILY MEMBERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS OR ANY PERSONS CLAIMING UNDER HIM FROWN IN ANY WITH TAKING AWAY THE CUSTODY OF
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
