Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.Sandesh, B. Muralidhara Pai, JJ
Hanamanth – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of the prosecution's factual matrix. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellate arguments challenging circumstantial and forensic reliability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. state arguments countering insufficiency of evidence claims. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. validation of circumstantial evidence and recovery of objects. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 5. evaluation of forensic science, odontology, and medical evidence. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. scrutiny of charges under ipc 307 and 325. (Para 36 , 38) |
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 21.07.2023 AND SENTENCE DATED 24.07.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALAKOTE IN S.C. NO. 122/2019 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 451, 376(2)(I), 307, 325 AND 380 OF I.P.C. & ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON 09.04.2026, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
This appeal is filed challenging the judgmen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
