SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21351

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK S. KINAGI
PARAPPA S/O FAKIRAPPA HUGAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. YALLAVVA W/O HANAMAPPA – Respondent
WP 104352/2025



##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4528 WP No. 104352 of 2025

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI

WRIT PETITION NO.104352 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

PARAPPA S/O. FAKIRAPPA HUGAR, AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,

R/O. KATARAKI, TAL. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE, PIN-587201.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.C. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1) SMT. YALLAVVA W/O. HANAMAPPA @ HANAMANTAPPA HUGAR,

AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: KADARAKOPPA, TAL: BADAMI,

DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587201.

MOHANKUMAR 2) BASAPPA S/O. HANAMAPPA B SHELAR HANAMANTAPPA HUGAR,

AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B R/O: KADARAKOPPA, TAL. BADAMI, SHELAR

DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587201.

Date: 2026.03.27 15:51:46 +0530

3) SMT. SHIVAGANGAVVA W/O. MALLAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: HALAKATTI, TAL : SAVADATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI, PIN-591126.

4) SMT. THIRTHAVVA W/O. PANDAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: KATAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587205.

##PAGE2##

- 2 -

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4528 WP No. 104352 of 2025

HC-KAR

5) SMT. SHANKRAVVA W/O. BASAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: KATAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587205.

6) SMT. SUVARNA W/O. IRAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: HERKAL, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587116.

7) SMT. HANAMAVVA W/O. SANGAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: KADAPATTI, TAL: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN:587119.

8) SHANKRAPPA S/O. SANGAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,

R/O: KAGALAGOMBA, TAL: BADAMI, DIST : BAGALKOTE, PIN-587205.

9) PARAPPA @ PRABHU S/O. SANGAPPA HUGAR,

AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KAGALAGOMBA, TAL: BADAMI,

DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587205.

10) SMT. MAHADEVI W/O. SHIVANAND HUGAR, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: KADAPATTI, TAL: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587119.

11) BASAPPA S/O. FAKIRAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,

R/O: KATAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587205.

12) SMT. SHARADA @ SHARAVVA W/O. BASAPPA HUGAR,

AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPTIAL, KERUR,

##PAGE3##

- 3 -

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4528 WP No. 104352 of 2025

HC-KAR

TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587206.

13) SMT. SUSHILAVVA W/O. PANDAPPA HUGAR, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O: HALAGATTI, TAL: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI, PIN-591123.

14) SMT. SHANKRAVVA @ SHANKRAMMA W/O. HANAMANT HUGAR,

AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, KERUR,

TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN-587205.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. PRAKASH N.HOSAMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;

NOTICE TO R4 TO R6, R8 TO R12 AND R14 ARE SERVED;

NOTICE TO R7 AND R13 ARE DISPENSED WITH)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.10.2024 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BADAMI IN OS. NO.174/2021 TAKING THE CROSS EXAMINATION CLOSED, A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO FURTHER CROSS EXAMINATION OF PW-1 IN O.S. NO.174/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BADAMI AND

ETC.,.

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

##PAGE4##

- 4 -

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4528 WP No. 104352 of 2025

HC-KAR

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition

challenging the order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Badami, in O.S. No.174/2021, wherein the trial Court closed the cross-

examination of P.W.1.

2. Brief facts, leading rise to the filing of this

petition are as follows:

3. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed a suit in O.S.

No.174/2021 against the petitioner and others seeking the relief of partition and separate possession of the properties

described in Schedule ‘A’ to the plaint.

4. The petitioner filed a written statement denying

the averments made in the plaint. Based on the rival pleadings of the partie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top