SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21774

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.Krishna Kumar, J
Siddaraju D.N – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 11091 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sandesh Kumar M
For the Respondents: Aritha Kulkarni, Siddarth Babu Rao

In the absence of a statutory definition for 'completed year' in recruitment rules, contract employees are entitled to proportionate service weightage for periods less than a full academic year to ensure fair treatment in the selection process, provided the initial recruitment was merit-based and not back-door entry.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ of Mandamus - Service weightage - Selection and appointment - Petitioner seeking service weightage at 5% per academic year and proportionate weightage for part-year service - Issue of 'completed year of service' discussed under Cadre and Recruitment Regulations - Whether proportionate weightage allowable for service less than one academic year. (Paras 1, 3, 27, 29)

(B) Service Law - Recruitment Rules - Interpretation of 'completed year' - Held, the expression is not defined in the governing regulations - Strict interpretation resulting in injustice to qualified candidates is impermissible - Proportionate weightage is intended to provide relief to contract employees, and in the absence of a definition, judicial intervention to grant proportionate weightage to those serving less than one academic year is justified, provided they meet other eligibility criteria. (Paras 27, 29, 32)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a teacher on contract, sought a writ of mandamus to direct the employer to grant service weightage at 5% per completed academic year and proportionate weightage for any part-year service performed. The petitioner contended that such benefits were extended to other similarly placed teachers and sought parity in the recruitment process.

Findings of Court:
The Court observed that the issue was covered by earlier judicial pronouncements which established that the employees' entry into service was not illegal and that they were qualified. The court held that while the regulations mention 'completed year', the lack of a formal definition, combined with the fact that schools often have different opening dates and contract terms, necessitates a proportionate approach to ensure fair selection.

Issues: Whether the employer is required to grant service weightage for partially completed academic years and whether the denial of such weightage based on a strict interpretation of 'completed year' is sustainable in law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where recruitment regulations for contract employees do not define 'completed year of service', a strict construction that denies weightage to those who have served for less than a full year is inequitable, especially when entry into service followed a competitive process. Consequently, proportionate weightage must be applied to honor the object of the one-time regularization measure.

Result: Petition disposed of with a direction to the employer to consider the petitioner's representation in accordance with the law and binding precedents within two months.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to grant service weightage for recruitment. (Para 1)
2. court holds the controversy is governed by established precedents regarding service weightage for contract teachers. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondents directed to consider petitioner's representation in line with judicial precedents. (Para 5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO GRANT SERVICE WEIGHTAGE AT THE RATE OF 5 PER CENT PER EACH COMPLETED ACADEMIC YEAR, IRRESPECTIVE OF DATE OF APPOINTMENT, AND TO FURTHER GRANT APPROPRIATE WEIGHTAGE FOR ANY PART YEAR SERVICE RENDERED, INCLUDING THE SERVICE LESS THAN ONE FULL ACADEMIC YEAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND BINDING THE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENT. THE PETITIONER FURTHER SEEKS DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE CASES FOR SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT TO THE POST HE HAS APPLIED FOR UNDER THE RECRUITMENT CONDUCTED BY THE KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION SOCIETY (KREIS) IN THE LIGHT OF HIS QUALIFYING SERVICE AND REPRESENTATION DATED 04.10.2025 VIDE SUBMITTED AND TO GRANT D/4-10-2025 VIDE ANNEX-K. HIM THE BENEFIT OF SUCH SERVICE WEIGHTAGE AS HAS ALREADY BEEN EXTENDED TO SIMILARLY PLACED TEACHERS AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

(a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or, order or direction directing the respondent no.2 to grant service weightage at the rate of 5 per cent per each completed academic year, irrespective of date of appointment, and to further grant appropriate weightage for any part year service rendered, including the service less than one full academic year in accordance with law and binding the judicial pronouncement. The petitioner further seeks direction to the respondent no.2 to consider the cases for selection and appointment to the post he has applied for under the Recruitment conducted by the Karnataka Residential Educational Institution Society (KREIS) in the light of his DI4-10-2025 vice Annexure-K qualifying service and representation dated 04.10.2025 submitted and to grant him the benefit of such service weightage as has already been extended to similarly placed teachers.

(b) Issue other writ of mandamus to direct the respondent no.2 to include the name of the petitioner in the final selection list and to appoint them to the respective post with effect from the day on which other similarly placed candidates were appointed under the same recruitment process or from the date of occurrence of vacancy, whichever is higher, and to consequently extend all service related benefits including of fixation of pay, arrears of salary, continuity of service and annual increments in order to meet the ends of justice.

c) And pass any other orders or order as this Hon'ble court deems fit to be granted in the facts and circumstances of the case by allowing this writ petition in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgments of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the cases of The Karnataka Residential Educational Institutions Society Vs. Mounesh – W.A.No.545/2021 dated 07.11.2022 and The Karnataka Residential Educational Institutions Society Vs. Vishwanath M.S. , - W.A.No.360/2020 and Connected matters dated 19.07.2023 and judgment of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Vishwanath M.S. and Ors Vs. The State of Karnataka – W.P.Nos.8113-8131/2015 and connected matters dated 22.10.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top