THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SHANMUGAM P S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 30/2026
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:21470
CRL.P No. 30 of 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 30 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1. SHANMUGAM P S
AGED 58 YEARS
R/A NO. NO. 10,
THOTADA GUDADA HALLI,
NAGASANDRA,
BANGALORE - 560 073.
2. APPANNA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O P.A. POOVAIAH,
R/A NO. 5, 20TH CROSS,
TC PALYA MAIN, SRI MV NAGAR,
MUNESHWARA NAGAR,
Digitally
DOORAVANINAGAR,
signed by
SANJEEVINI J
BENGALURU - 560 016
KARISHETTY
Location:
High Court of
3. SHAMANNA REDDY,
Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
S/O CHIKKABBAIAH REDDY,
R/AT 9TH MAIN ROAD,
SHYAMANNA REDDY LAYOUT,
HONGASANDRA,
BOMMANAHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 068.
…PETITIONERS
(BY MS. AVANI CHOKSHI, ADVOCATE)
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:21470
CRL.P No. 30 of 2026
HC-KAR
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY UPPARPETE POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY
THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO 1. SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 25.09.2021 TAKING COGNIZANCE OF
OFFENCES P/U/S 269 OF IPC 1860, AND SEC. 51(b) OF
DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT, 2005 AGAINST THE
PETITIONERS AND THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.25509/2021
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LRD. V ADDL. CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE, PRODUCED
HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:21470
CRL.P No. 30 of 2026
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel, Ms. Avani Chokshi, appearing
for the petitioners, Sri. Channappa Erappa, learned HCGP
appearing for the respondent and have perused the material on
record.
2. The petitioners are before this Court, seeking the
following prayer:
"(i) SET ASIDE order dated 25.09.2021 taking
cognizance of offences under Section 269 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 51(b) of
Disaster Management Act, 2005 against the
Petitioners and the proceedings in C.C.
No.25509/2021 pending on the file of the Learned
V Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,
Bangalore, produced herewith as ANNEXURE-B;
and,
(ii) Consequently, quash the Complaint filed against
the Petitioners by the Respondent dated
20.09.2021 pending before the Learned V
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore,
produced herewith as Annexure-C; and,
(iii) Pass such other orders/ directions as this Hon'ble
Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances
of the case, in the interests of justice."
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would
submit that the issue in the lis stands covered by the judgment
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:21470
CRL.P No. 30 of 2026
HC-KAR
rendered by this Court in W.P.No.34537/2024 disposed on
18.12.2024, wherein it has held as follows:
"Petitioners are before this Court calling in question
proceedings in C.C.No.1383 of 2021, registered for
offence punishable under section 188 of the IPC and
under section 51(b) of the Disaster Management Act,
2005.
2. Heard the learned counsel Smt Sruti Chaganti
appearing for petitioners and Sri Rangaswamy R, learned
High Court Government Pleader appearing for
respondent/State.
3. Both the learned counsel would submit that the
issue in the lis stands answered by the judgments
rendered by this Court in Crl.P.No.3432 of 2023 disposed
on 07-07-2023 and in Crl.P.No.5053 of 2023 disposed on
28-07-2023, qua interpretation of Section 51(b) of the
Disaster Management At and Section 188 of the IPC.
4. This Court in Crl.P.No.3432 of 2023 disposed
on 07-07-2023 has held as follows:
“…. …. ….
7. The afore-narrated facts are not in
dispute. The issue lies in a narrow compass, as to
whether the learned Magistrate could have taken
cognizance of the offence under Section 51(b) of the Act.
To consider the said issue, it is germane to notice certain
provisions of the Act. Section 51 of the Act deals with
punishment for obstruction and reads as follows:
"51.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.