THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B M SHYAM PRASAD AND SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA – Appellant
Versus
CHANNAGOUDA S/O. SHANTAGOUDA KONNUR – Respondent
WP 108123/2023
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC-D:5737-DB WP No. 108123 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL 2026
PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
WRIT PETITION NO.108123 OF 2023 (S-KAT)
BETWEEN:
THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S.BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS
REGISTRAR LOKAYUKTA.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B.NAIK, SPP)
AND:
V ISHAL
1. CHANNAGOUDA NINGAPPA S/O. SHANTAGOUDA KONNUR, PATTIHAL
AGE: 41 YEARS, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PRESENTLY WORKING AS PATTIHAL
Location: HIGH COURT VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH CHIKKADAPUR, TALUKA-ILKAL,
R/O. GUDUR, TALUKA-HUNAGUND, DIST: BAGALKOT-587202.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (SERVICES-2),
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC-D:5737-DB WP No. 108123 of 2023
HC-KAR
M.S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHARAD V.MAGADUM, AGA FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23/12/2022 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI IN APPLICATION NO.10420/2022 (PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A); CONSEQUENTLY RESTORATION THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 04/02/2022 BEARING NO.KUM.E.94.BIDIPI 2012 VIDE ANNEXURE–A6 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IMPOSING THE PENALTY OF COMPULSORY RETIREMENT FROM THE SERVICE TO RESPONDENT NO.1 IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY; AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE
THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC-D:5737-DB WP No. 108123 of 2023
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)
This writ petition is filed prying to issue a writ of
certiorari and quash the impugned order dated 23.12.2022 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Belagavi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’ for brevity) in Application No.10420 of 2022 (Annexure –A) and consequently restore the Government order dated 04.02.2022 passed by respondent No.2 imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement from the service to respondent
No.1.
2. The facts leading to filing of application by respondent No.1 before the Tribunal are as under
a. Respondent No.1 -applicant was working
as Village Accountant at Mahalingpura in Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District. A complaint was filed by Smt.Sunanda on 09.11.2011 that when she approached the applicant for change of khata in respect of plot which stood in the name of her
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC-D:5737-DB WP No. 108123 of 2023
HC-KAR
husband, the applicant demanded Rs.1,500/- as bribe. The complainant on that day since brought only Rs.500/- and when offered the applicant returned the documents without accepting the money and directed the complainant to give the amount on the next day. Thereafter, on 19.11.2011, a private person namely Sri Lalssab Mohammed Sanadi, at the instance of the applicant, accepted Rs.1,500/- as bribe from the complainant. Based on the complaint made by the complainant, a criminal case was registered against the applicant and another in Crime No.17 of 2011 for offences punishable under Sections 7, 8, 13(1)(D) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’ for brevity). The applicant came to be acquitted in Special Case No.20/2012 by judgment dated 16.01.2019 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot for offences punishable under 7, 8, 13(1)(D) read with Section
13(2) of the Act.
##PAGE5##- 5 -
NC: 2026:KHC-D:5737-DB WP No. 108123 of 2023
HC-KAR
b. Based on the complaint filed by
Smt.Sunanda, an order was passed under Rule 14-A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 by the respondent No.2 entrusting the matter to the petitioner to hold a departmental enquiry agai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.