SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22974

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


NC: 2026:KHC:20773


WRIT PETITION NO. 9685 OF 2025 (GM-RES)


BETWEEN:

1. VISION INDIA PUBLIC SCHOOL REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL

RONUR CROSS, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 563135

…PETITIONER


(BY SRI. NITIN .A.M, ADVOCATE)


AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION VIKASA SOUDHA

BENGALURU- 560001.


Digitally signed by

2. THE COMMISSIONER NAGARAJA B M OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER Location: DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

HIGH COURT NRUPATHUNGA ROAD OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560001


3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (DDPI),

DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION KOLAR DISTRICT KOLAR - 563101.

4. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER SRINIVASAPURA, KOLAR DISTRICT

KOLAR - 563135. …RESPONDENTS


(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA)


THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM


DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 06/10/2023, 18/12/2023, 23/01/2024, 15/07/2024 AND 07/10/24 I.E. ANNX-D1, D2, D3, D4, E1 AND E2 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

ORAL ORDER

Captioned petition is filed seeking following reliefs:

"a) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.4 to consider the representations Dt. 06-10-2023, 18-12-2023, 23-01-2024, 15-07-2024 & 07-10-2024 i.e., ANNEXURE-D1, D2, D3, D4, E1 & E2 respectively;

b) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to consider the representations Dt. 05-11-2025, 03-01-2025 & 05-02-2025 i.e., ANNEXURE-F1, H & L respectively;

c) To direct Respondent No.2 to 4 to restore the user ID and Password of the Petitioner and permit the Petitioner to apply for the 4 pending installments of RTE reimbursements for the academic year 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25.

d) To direct the Respondent No.4 to ensure that the pending 4 installments of RTE reimbursement for the academic year 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25 are paid to the Petitioner School;

e) And to grant such other order or relief to which the Petitioner may be found entitled to under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice."

The petitioner is an educational institution engaged in imparting education at the primary and secondary levels and is affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education. It is the specific case of the petitioner that, in strict compliance with the mandate contained under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short, “RTE Act”) and the Karnataka Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, the institution has admitted students belonging to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) to the extent of 25% of the intake. It is further averred that for the academic years 2022–23 and 2023–24, such admissions have been duly effected and, cumulatively, the petitioner–institution has imparted education to as many as 158 students under the said quota for the period from the academic year 2016–17 up to 2022–23.

The gist of the petitioner’s grievance is that, despite having submitted the online application seeking reimbursement of the second instalment under the RTE scheme for the academic year 2022–23, the same has not been released till date. It is contended that repeated representations have been submitted to the respondent– authorities, however, there has been inaction and palpable apathy in considering the same. It is in this backdrop that the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the reimbursement amount lawfully due.

Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that certain discrepancies are noticed in the admissions made by the petitioner–institution and, therefore, the competent authority is required to verify and examine such discrepancies before processing and releasing the reimbursement.

This Court, having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having perused the material on record, finds that the petitioner–institution has placed on record documents indicating compliance with the statutory requirements under the RTE framework, including admission of students under the EWS quota and the corresponding entitlement for reimbursement.

The contention advanced by the respondents that discrepancies exist in the admission process cannot be countenanced as a ground to indefinitely withhold the reimbursement legitimately due to the petitioner. Under the scheme of the RTE Act, once students are admitted and education is imparted under the 25% reservation, the corresponding obligation is cast upon the State to ensure timely reimbursem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top