Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V Srishananda, J
T K Jagannath Shetty – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of trial court findings and history of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. appellate analysis of evidence, expert reports, and eyewitness testimony in road accidents. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding sufficiency of evidence and sentence modification. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court applies s. 106 evidence act and limits revisional interference in sentencing. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2018 IN CRL.A.NO.42/2014 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT KODAGU-MADIKERI, SITTING AT VIRAJPET AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 02.06.2014 IN C.C.NO.1029/2009 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT VIRAJPET AND THE REVISION PETITIONER MAY BE ORDERED TO BE ACQUITTED IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri N. Ravindranath Kamath, learned Senior Counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri K. Nageshwarappa, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/St
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
