SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 23663

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S. Indiresh, J
Karnataka State Association Of The Management Of Nursing And Allied Health Science Institutions – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.7165 OF 2026|WRIT PETITION NO.9176 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Uday Holla, T. Krishna, P.P. Hegde, Rajaram S.
For the Respondents: Sukanya Baliga B., M.S. Devaraju, Mamatha Kulkarni, Nithin A.M.

The executive body of a university cannot unilaterally exclude members of the legislative body from the inspection committee for college affiliations, as the legislative body holds plenary powers under the governing Act, and any resolution undermining this statutory oversight is legally invalid.

Headnote:(A) University Act - Sections 23, 34, 45 - Affiliation of colleges - Continuation of affiliation - Local Inspection Committee - Composition - Whether executive body can exclude members of legislative body from inspection committee - Held, legislative body is the supreme authority with power to make and amend statutes - Executive body is the principal executive organ - Resolution excluding legislative members from the inspection process is contrary to the statutory scheme - Inspection process for continuation of affiliation requires participation of legislative nominees to ensure compliance with mandatory provisions - Decision of executive body in derogation of legislative oversight is bad in law. (Paras 18-24, 28)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Mandamus - Direction to legislature - Court cannot direct legislature to enact or amend law - Legislative body is the sole authority to modify existing law - Judicial restraint in policy matters. (Paras 25-26)

Facts of the case:
Two petitions were filed. One by an association seeking a direction to the government to amend the governing Act for permanent affiliation and to conduct inspections. The other by members of the legislative body of the university challenging a resolution of the executive body that excluded them from the inspection committee for the renewal of college affiliations.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the legislative body holds plenary powers and the executive body's resolution to exclude legislative members from the inspection committee was legally unsustainable as it bypassed the oversight role mandated by the governing Act.

Issues: Whether the executive body of the university has the authority to unilaterally exclude members of the legislative body from the inspection committee for the continuation of college affiliations.

Ratio Decidendi: The legislative body possesses the supreme authority to formulate policies and amend statutes. Any executive resolution that undermines the statutory role of the legislative body in the affiliation process is ultra vires and lacks legal validity.

Result: The petition filed by the association was dismissed, and the petition filed by the legislative members was allowed; the impugned resolution was quashed.

Table of Content
1. procedural context for senate and syndicate conflict on inspection committees. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. contentions regarding the legal authority to constitute affiliation inspection committees. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. senate's legislative primacy in the university affiliation inspection process. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24)
4. courts cannot mandate legislative changes to statutes. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

CAV ORDER

Writ Petition No.7165 of 2026 is filed by the Karnataka State Association of the Management of Nursing and Allied Health Science Institutions (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Petitioner-Association') seeking direction to the respondent No.1-Government to recommend the respondent No.3- University to grant permanent affiliation to the institutions which have been affiliated continuously for a period of more than five years in terms of Proviso to Section 45(6) of the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Act, 1994 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'RGUHS Act'). The petitioner- Association also sought for direction to the respondent No.1- Government to consider the representation dated 04th December, 2026 (Annexure-E) to amend the provisions of the RGUHS Act; inter alia sought for a direction to the respondent WP NO.9176 OF 2026 HC-KAR No.2-University to conduct inspection for continuation of affiliation for the Academic Year 2026-27 onwards in terms of decision taken in Subject 194/IX(1) of 194th (Special) Syndicate Meeting held on 24th December, 2024 as per letter dated 30th December, 2024 (Annexure-D).

2. Writ Petition No.9176 of 2026 is filed by the petitioners claim to be a Members of the Senate of the respondent No.3-University, challenging the decision taken in respect of Subject 194/IX(1) of 194th (Special) Syndicate Meeting held on 24th December, 2024 as per letter dated 30th December, 2024 (Annexure-A).

3. The facts in nutshell for the purpose of adjudication of Writ Petition No.7165 of 2026 are as follows:

3.1. The petitioner-Association challenged the action of the respondent No.3-University in appointing the Senate Members as the Chairman of the Local Inspection Committee (LIC) for the purpose of inspection of institutions affiliated to the respondent No.3-University for grant of continuation of affiliation for the Academic Year 2026-27 as the same is contrary to RGUHS Act and the statues framed thereunder as WP NO.9176 OF 2026 HC-KAR well as to the decision arrived at the 194th Syndicate Meeting of the respondent No.3-University held on 24th December, 2024.

3.2. It is further averred in writ petition that, as per Section 45(6) of the RGUHS Act, provision has been made to grant permanent affiliation to an institutions which were affiliated continuously for a period not less than five years by fulfilling all the conditions of affiliation and have attained the academic and administrative standards prescribed by the respondent No.3-University. It is further stated that, Section 47(2) of the RGUHS Act authorises the Syndicate to inspect every such colleges from time to time, however, it does not specify for every year, to conduct the inspection for the purpose of continuation of affiliation. Therefore, it is the contention of the petitioner-Association that, the respondent No.3-University having been inspecting each of the institutions, though it is not provided in the RGUHS Act, to carryout such inspection every year and that apart, the statute cannot override the law and as such, the statute was silent as to who should be the competent person under Section 47 of the RGUHS Act for the purpose of inspection of the grant of fresh WP NO.9176 OF 2026 HC-KAR affiliation and continuation of affiliation. Therefore, it is contended by the petitioner-Association that the respondent No.3-University shall conduct inspection for continuation of affiliation for the Academic year 2026-27 as per the decision taken in 194th (Special) Syndicate Meeting of the res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top