SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 23803

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
DR – Appellant
Versus
KIRAN KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.37323 OF 2025 (EDN-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. DR. V.S. KIRAN KUMAR S/O N VEERABHADHRACHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT INDIRA NAGARA, HUCHAVVANAHALLI, DAVANAGERE - 577534.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUMANA BALIGA M., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION(NMC)

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, POCKET-14, SECTOR-8, DWARKA PHASE-I, Digitally signed by NEW DELHI-110077.

CHAYA S A Location: H IGH COURT OF 2. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF KARNATAKA HEALTH SCIENCES (RGUHS)

4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041.

REP. BY REGISTRAR (EVALUATION).

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHOWRI H.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SMT. MAMATHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE CLAUSE 8.4(B) OF THE 'CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF M.S./M.D./M.CH./DM COURSES' UNDER PGMER-2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-C TO THE EXTENT IT MANDATES ROUNDING-OFF OF MARKS AND FIXES 200/400 AS THE RIGID THRESHOLD FOR PASSING THEORY EXAMINATIONS, AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ARBITRARY, DISPROPORTIONATE, AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top