SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24059

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
NAJARUDDIN S/O RAMAZAN NADAF – Appellant
Versus
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 71537 OF 2012 (L-KSRTC)

BETWEEN:

NAJARUDDIN S/O RAMAZAN NADAF, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. KOTHALLI, TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI.

… PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR S. NAGASHETTI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.E.K.R.T.C, BALLARY DIVISION, BALLARI … RESPONDENT (BY MS. H.R. RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR SAMREEN SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)

AYUB DESHNUR D SA ig M it R al E ly E s N ig A n Y e U d B by THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND DESHNUR L O o F c a K t A io R n N : A H T IG AK H A COURT 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.Chandrashekhar S.Nagashetti, counsel for the petitioner and Counsel Smt.H.R.Renuka, on behalf of Sri. Prakash N.Hosamani, for the respondent have appeared in person.

2. The brief facts are these:

The petitioner was an employee in the establishment of the Corporation. He came under disciplinary inquiry proceedings for an act of misconduct and unauthorized absence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top