SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. Nagaprasanna, J
SRI SUNIL C S – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE BY MICO LAYOUT POLICE STATION – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 9028 OF 2026 (GM-RES)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ganesh Bhat, Satish K.
For the Respondents: Channappa Erappa

Criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial disputes, specifically under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, may be quashed by the High Court if the parties have voluntarily reached a comprehensive settlement through mediation.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Proceedings - Matrimonial Disputes - Quashing of proceedings - Where parties have voluntarily arrived at a comprehensive settlement in mediation for divorce and agreed to the closure of criminal proceedings, the Court may quash the proceedings to facilitate the settlement and ensure finality. (Para 3, 4)

Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act can be quashed based on a settlement reached between the parties in mediation.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the petition and procedural context of the criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the mediation settlement and agreement to dissolve marriage and close criminal cases. (Para 3)
3. quashing of criminal proceedings based on the voluntary settlement between parties. (Para 4 , 5)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023 , PRAYING TO A) CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO C.C. NO. 23971/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU. B) ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE IMPUGNED CHARGE SHEET DATED 13/04/2024 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1-MICO LAYOUT POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 498A, 323, 504, 506 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 (ANNEXURE - C) AND ALL PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.23971/2024 (ANNEXURE-D), IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.23971/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A , 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard Sri. Ganesh Bhat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Channappa Erappa, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 and have perused the material on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the settlement is arrived at between the parties in the course of Mediation by drawing certain terms and conditions, which is then filed before the III Addl. Family Court, Bangalore in M.C.No.4695/2023. One of the condition of settlement was closure of the present proceedings as well. The memorandum of settlement reads as follows:

"MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF CPC READ WITH RULES 24 AND 25 OF THE KARNATAKA CIVIL PROCEDURE (MEDIATION) RULES, 2005.

The parties above named submit as follows:-

The petitioner has filed the above petition under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking for decree of divorce against the respondent.

I. The aforesaid petition was referred to mediation for resolving the dispute between the parties. In the course of mediation, the petitioner and the respondent along with their counsel were present, identified each other and the parties have resolved their disputes by agreeing to the following terms and conditions:-

1. The petitioner and the respondent state that their marriage was solemnized on 28.11.2021 at R.G Palace Convention Hall, Near By Pass Circle, Holenarasipura Road, Hassan, as per Hindu rites and customs. Subsequently, the said marriage was registered on 11.05.2022 before the Registrar of Marriage, Hassan, vide certificate No. HSN-HM102-22-23 stored in C.D No.HSNM9.

2. The petitioner and the respondent state that, due to irreconcilable differences between them and due to incompatibility of temperaments, have been living separately since January 2022. The efforts made by their elders, well-wishers and relatives to reunite them and to bring them under one roof as husband and wife to lead a happy married life did not yield any fruitful result. It is for that reason, they are unable to lead a married life. There is absolutely no chance of re-union amongst themselves. Hence, they have decided to get the marriage between themselves dissolved by a decree of divorce as prayed by the petitioner.

3. The petitioner and the respondent state that they have no children born to them from their wedlock.

4. Both the petitioner and the respondent are gainfully employed as such they have no claims of maintenance/permanent alimony against each other.

5. Both the petitioner and the respondent state and agree that they have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top