Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Ashok S. Kinagi, J
SMT. K LAXMI W/O SHIVAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notices for removal of unauthorized structures in heritage area. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions regarding natural justice versus supreme court's mandate. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. binding effect of supreme court directions on heritage zone enforcement. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. dismissal of petitions with liberty to move apex court. (Para 11) |
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)
1. The petitioners have challenged the notices/endorsement dated 21.06.2017 issued by 3rd respondent-The Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority.
2. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of these writ petitions are as follows:
3. The respondent No.3 issued NOC and license to run Hotels and Restaurants to the petitioners and the said license were renewed from time to time. Public Interest Litigation came to be filed in Writ Petition No.29843/2009. The said PIL came to be disposed of vide order dated 22.01.2016 wherein the 3rd respondent submitted that action will be taken to remove the illegal and unauthorized activities as expeditiously as possible. The 3rd respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
