SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26754

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
MR. SHASHIKUMAR. M – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT DIRECTOR – Respondent


THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED COMMUNICATION DTD 30.09.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-1 BEARING NO. PRJ/9650/2021-22 (ANNEXURE-F) TO THE EXTENT THAT IT REQUIRES THE PETITIONER TO RELINQUISH 380.71 SQ.M., OF HIS PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENT BBMP FOR THE PURPOSES OF ROAD WIDENING , WITHOUT PAYMENT OF ANY COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER IN LIEU OF SUCH RELINQUISHMENT AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS AND HAVING BEEN RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 26.02.2026, THIS DAY, THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

CAV ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the Impugned Communication dated September 30, 2024 issued by the Respondent No.1, bearing No.PRJ/9650/2021-22 (Annexure-F), to the extent that it requires the petitioner to relinquish 380.71 sq.m., of his property in favour of the Respondent BMP for the purposes of road widening, without payment of any compensation to the petitioner in lieu of such relinquishment;

b. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top