SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26983

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SUNIL.T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent


THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE ABOVE PETITIONERS IN CR.NO.65/2025 OF TUMAKURU WOMEN P.S TUMAKURU, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT TUMKUR FOR O/P/U/S 85,115(2),351(2),352,3(5) OF BNS ACT 2023 AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT 1961.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 6. Respondent No.2 is the complainant are before this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No. 65 of 2025.

2. Heard Sri.Nagamani V, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri.Rashmi Patel, learned HCGP appearing for the respondents.

3. Before embarking upon the consideration of the issue in the lis, I deem it appropriate to notice the relationship between the parties. Petitioner No.1 - accused No.1 is the husband of the complainant, petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law, petitioner No.3 is the father-in-law, petitioner No.4 is the sister-in-law, petitioner Nos.5 and 6 are the other membe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top