SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


NC: 2026:KHC:25906


CRL.P No. 8219 of 2025


DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026


BEFORE


THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8219 OF 2025


BETWEEN:


1. SUNIL T.


AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,


S/O THIMMAIAH. H


2. MAHALAKSHMI @ D. MAHALAKSHMAMMA


AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,


W/O THIMMAIAH H.,


3. THIMMAIAH. H


AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,


S/O LATE HANUMAIAH


PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE


RESIDING AT THUMBADI VILLAGE AND POST


KORTAGERE (RURAL)


TUMKUR - 572 129


4. RAMYA. T.


AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,


W/O. AJAY K.S.


R/AT KALLASETKUNTE


BRAMASANDRA AT POST


KORA HOBLI


TUMKUR - 572 101


5. SARITHA T N


AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,


W/O. MOHAN KUMAR K T


R/AT CHARKRABAVI


KORAMANGALA


RAMANAGAR - 562 120


6. LAKSHMISHA T.


AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,


S/O THIMMAIAH H,


R/AT NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE,


DHARMPURA MAIN ROAD,


BHOVI COLONY, HIRIYUR TALUK,


BABBURU POST


CHITHRADURGA - 577 598


(BY SMT. NAGAMANI V., ADVOCATE)


AND:


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY


TUMAKURU WOMEN POLICE STATION


TUMAKURU


REPRESENTED BY SPP


HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA


BENGALURU - 560 001


2. CHAITHRA. A.


AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS


W/O SUNIL T.


R/AT BEHIND ASHRAYA HOSPITAL,


YALLAPURA,


TUMKUR - 572 106


…RESPONDENTS


(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1


SRI. MALLIKARJUN B. RYAKHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE ABOVE PETITIONERS IN CR.NO.65/2025 OF TUMAKURU WOMEN P.S TUMAKURU, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT TUMKUR FOR O/P/U/S 85,115(2),351(2),352,3(5) OF BNS ACT 2023 AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT 1961.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 6. Respondent No.2 is the complainant are before this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No. 65 of 2025.

2. Heard Sri.Nagamani V, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri.Rashmi Patel, learned HCGP appearing for the respondents.

3. Before embarking upon the consideration of the issue in the lis, I deem it appropriate to notice the relationship between the parties. Petitioner No.1 - accused No.1 is the husband of the complainant, petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law, petitioner No.3 is the father-in-law, petitioner No.4 is the sister-in-law, petitioner Nos.5 and 6 are the other members of the family.

4. Accused No.1 and the complainant get married in the year 2023. It transpires that the relationship between the accused No.1 and the complainant flounders. On floundering of the relationship, the complainant seeks to register a complaint implicating all six accused, the relationship of whom is described herein above into the web of crime for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The registration of the crime is what has driven the petitioners to this Court in the subject petition.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the in-laws or even distant relatives of the accused No.1 are drawn into the web of proceedings without any rhyme or reason. Therefore, would submit that the proceedings/investigation must not be continued in the case on hand.

6. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 - complainant would submit that the allegations galore against all the accused. Therefore, it is for the accused to face investigation in the least. He would seek dismissal of the petition.

7. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the available material on record.

8. The afore-narrated relationship between the parties are a matter of record, which would not require any reiteration. The entire issue has now triggered from the registration of the complaint. The complaint so registered reads as follows.

"ಈ ೕಲಮಡ ಾಸದಾನು ಾಸಾದು. ಾಂಕ 11/12/2023 ರಂದು ನನ ಾಹವ ಗುರು ಯರ "ಶ$ಯದಂ%ೆ 'ೊರಟ*ೆ+ೆ %ಾಲೂಕು ತುಂ-ಾ. *ಾ/ಮದ ಸು"0 12 3ಮ4ಯ5 ರವ+ೊಂ*ೆ 'ೊರಟ*ೆ+ೆಯರುವ ಊ.7*ೆ+ೆ 'ಾ/8 9ಾ:ಯ ಕ;ಾ5ಣ ಮಂಟಪದ ನ>ೆದು. ಮದುೆಯ ನಂತರ ನಮ*ೆ ಒಂದುವ+ೆ ವಷ7ದ Aಾನ5 ಸು"0 ಎಂಬ DೆಣುE ಮಗಳG ಇರು%ಾIೆ. ಮದುೆಯ ಸಂದಭ7ದನನ ಗಂಡ ಮತುIಅವರ ಮೆಯವರ ಒ%ಾIಯದಂ%ೆ 'ೊರಳ Lೈನು (25*ಾ/ಂ) ಒಂದು ಉಂಗುರ 10 *ಾ/ಂ -ೆ;ೆ -ಾಳGವ ಮತುIಬOೆP Dಾಗೂ ನನ*ೆ ಎರಡು Q RೆS ಓ;ೆಗಳG ಹಗೂ AಾU (30*ಾ/ಂ) Dಾಗೂ 'ಾಲು Lೈನು Dಾಗೂ ಎರಡು ಉಂಗುರ (15*ಾ/ಂ)Dಾಗೂ ಸುAಾರು (1) ಒಂದು ಲV -ೆ;ೆ -ಾಳGವ ಬOೆPಗಳG Dಾಗೂ 15.00(ಹೈದು ಲV) ಖಚು7 Aಾ. ಮದುೆ Aಾ.ರು%ಾI+ೆ. ೕರುಾ*ೆYಅಂದ+ೆ ನನ*ೆ DೆಣುEಜನನಾದ ಂದ, ನನ ಗಂಡ ನನ ಅ%ೆIಮDಾಲ[\ೕ Dಾಗೂ Aಾವ 3ಮ4ಯ5 ಮತುIನನ ಾ"ಯ+ಾದ ರಮ5 ಮತುIಸ ತ ನಮ4*ೆ ದ ದ/ ಬಂ]ೆ.

ಆದ ಂದ, "ೕನು ಮೆ 'ೆಲಸದವಾರು ಎಂದು ಪ/3 "ತ5 Aಾನ_ಕ ಮತುI ]ೈಕಾ ಂRೆ "ೕಡು3Iದರು. Dಾಗೂ ನನ ಗಂಡ 'ೆಲಸ'ೆ Dೋದ ನಂತರ ಾನು 'ೆಲಸ ಮು_ದ ನಂತರ ನನನು ಮೆಯಇರ-ೇಕು Dೊರಗ>ೆ Dೋಗ-ಾರದು `ಾರನು Aಾತಾಡ-ಾರದು, ಎಂದು ಮೆಯ ಕೂ. Dಾಕು3Iದರು. U ೋಡ-ಾರದು Dಾಗೂ ನನ ಮದುೆ ನಂದ ತಂ]ೆ %ಾaಯ 9ೊ%ೆ Aಾತಾಡ-ೇ'ೆಂದ+ೆ ಾನು ಏನು Aಾತಾಡ-ೇ'ೆಂದು ನನ ಗಂಡ"*ೆ Dೇಳ-ೇQತುIಆಗ ಅವರು ನನ ತಂ]ೆ %ಾa*ೆ ಏನು Aಾತಾಡ-ೇ'ೆಂದು 'ೇc ;ೌe _fೕಕg ಆ2 Aಾ. 'ೇವಲ ಎರಡು ":ಷ Aಾತಾಡ-ೇಕು ಎಂದು Dೇc ನನ ಗಂಡ ಮತುIಅ%ೆIಪಕದಕೂರು3Iದರು. ಾನು ಂ]ೆ;ಾಾೆ ಸ Dೋಗು%ಾI+ೆ ಎಂಬು]ಾ ನಂh]ೆ. ಾಂಕ 10/2/2025 ರಂದು ನಮ4 ತಂ]ೆ ಮೆಯ ಗೃಹಪ/ೇಶ ಯ;ಾಪರದೆರೇ ತುI. ನಮ4 ತಂ]ೆ %ಾaಯವರು ಪ3/'ೆ ಮತುIಬOೆPಗಳನು ಮೆಯವ+ೆಲ ಗೂ ತಂದು ಕ+ೆದು Dೋದರು ಅ]ೇ ನದಂದು ನನ ಗಂಡ 'ೆಲಸ ಮು_'ೊಂಡು ಬಂದು ತVಣ ನಮ4 ಮೆ*ೆ "ಮ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top