SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 27396

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.Pandit, K. V. Aravind, JJ
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Narasimhappa – Respondent
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 468 OF 2023 (MV-D)|MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 296 OF 2023 (MV-D)|MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 820 OF 2023 (MV-D)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ashok N. Patil, Latur Suresh Mahalingappa, Karthik B.Y.
For the Respondents: Latur Suresh Mahalingappa, Karthik B.Y., Ashok N. Patil

The 'pay and recover' principle remains operative against insurers in third-party claims even if terms of the insurance policy are breached, provided the existence of the insurance contract is established, subject to the insurer recovering such amounts from the insured.

Headnote:The case involves a motor vehicle accident resulting in the occupant's death, where the insurer challenged the 'pay and recover' order, the owner disputed liability, and the claimant sought compensation enhancement. Analyzing S.173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the court reaffirmed that while an insurer may avoid liability for policy breaches (e.g., driver license violation), it must satisfy third-party awards under the 'pay and recover' doctrine to balance victim and insurer rights. The court established that when an owner fails to prove the driver had a valid license despite insurer evidence, the liability remains with the owner, subject to the insurer's initial payment. The main issues were the validity of the 'pay and recover' directive and the correct calculation of notional income. Drawing on precedents, the court reasoned that the absence of a license does not absolve the insurer of third-party liability if the policy was active. Further, regarding compensation, the court refined the method of computing income for deceased minors by applying state-notified minimum wages for skilled workers, correctly categorizing heads like loss of estate while capping excessive conventional claims. The judgment modified the lower court order, dismissing the insurance and owner's appeals, and partially allowing the claimant’s appeal, ultimately awarding a total compensation of Rs. 19,60,000/-.

MFA No. 468 of 2023
C/W MFA No. 296 of 2023
MFA No. 820 of 2023
Reserved on : 17.03.2026
Pronounced on : 05.06.2026

IN MFA No. 468/2023
BETWEEN:
1. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR,
No.28, CENTENARY BUILDING, M. G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
NOW REP. BY MANAGER LEGAL.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI ASHOK N. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:
1. NARASIMHAPPA, S/O. LATE MUNI VENKATARAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: MASON,

R/AT: CHADURLAHALLI VILLAGE, KAMMADIKE SOMENAHALLI HOBLI
GUDIBANDE TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
2. VENKATAMMA D/O. LATE GANGAPPA,
RESIDENT OF NASTHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KETHINAHALLI POST,
CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI LATUR SURESH MAHALINGAPPA, ADVOCATE
FOR C/R1; SRI KARTHIK B.Y., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.11.2022 PASSED IN MVC No.5566/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE MACT, BENGALURU CITY, (SCCH-4), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.15,97,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALIZATION.

IN MFA No. 296/2023
BETWEEN:
1. SRI NARASIMHAPPA S/O LATE MUNI VENKATARAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT CHADURLAHALLI VILLAGE,
KAMMADIKE SOMENHALLI HOBLI, GUDIBANDE TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI LATUR SURESH MAHALINGAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:
1. SMT. VENKATAMMA, D/O. LATE GANGAPPA,
R/O NASTHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KETHINAHALI POST,
CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101.
2. THE MANAGER, M/S. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LIMITED, No.28/5, CENTENARY BUILDING,
EAST-WING, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARTHIK B.Y., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI ASHOK N. PTAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.11.2022 PASSED IN MVC No.5566/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, XVIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU SCCH-4, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA No. 820/2023
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VENKATAMMA, W/O. LATE GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, RESIDING AT NASTHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KETHINAHALLI POST, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK AND
DISTRICT - 562 101.
...APPELLANT (BY SRI. KARTHIK B.Y., ADVOCATE)

AND:
1. SRI NARASIMHAPPA, S/O LATE MUNI VENKATARAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHADURLAHALLI VILLAGE,
KAMMADIKE SOMENHALLI HOBLI, GUDIBANDE TALUK,
CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101.
2. THE MANAGER RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LTD., No.28/5, CENTENARY BUILDING
EAST WING, M. G. ROAD, BENGALURU.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. LATUR SURESH MAHALINGAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; SRI ASHOK N. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.11.2022 PASSED IN MVC No.5566/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU SCCH-4 AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.15.97,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE REALIZATION FROM THE RESPONDENTS.

THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, K.V. ARAVIND J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

C.A.V. JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND)

Heard Sri Ashok N. Patil, learned counsel for the insurer, Sri Karthik B.Y., learned counsel for the owner of the vehicle/insured and Sri Suresh M. Lathur, learned counsel appearing for the claimant.

These Miscellaneous First Appeals arise out of a common judgment and award dated 03.11.2022 passed in MVC No.5566/2018 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru City (for short 'Tribunal').

2.1 MFA No.468/2023 is filed by the insurer disputing the quantum of compensation as well as the direction to pay and recover. MFA No.820/2023 is filed by the owner of the vehicle, questioning the impugned judgment insofar as it directs pay and recovery. MFA No.296/2023 is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation.

2.2 Since all these















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top