SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 27526

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH
MR V CHANDRASHEKAR – Appellant
Versus
MR MUNITHIMMA REDDY @ SUBBARAYAPPA – Respondent


These two second appeals are filed praying this Court to set aside the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2009 passed by the Court of the Principal District Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bangaluru in R.A.No.199/2008 and R.A.No.188/2008 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 17.09.2008 passed by the Court of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), and JMFC, Anekal in O.S.No.937/2006 and directing respondent No.1 herein to pay Rs.77,500/- with interest at 15% from 28.08.2000 till payment by allowing these appeals with costs.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the appellant/plaintiff before the Trial Court while seeking the relief for specific performance is that there was an agreement of sale dated 11.07.1999 in respect of the property bearing Sy.No.75/2 measuring 35 guntas in Huskur Village, Sarjapur Hobli, Anekal Taluk and he has been in possession of the same. It is his case that he is also the owner in possession of land in Sy.Nos.31, 32/1 and 83 of Kaggalipura Village. It is contended by the plaintiff that all these lands are adjoining to each other. It is his case that there is a borewell in Sy.No.83 of Huskur village. The plaintiff was cultivating the lands with the assistance of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top