Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Lalitha Kanneganti, J
B C Saradamma – Appellant
Versus
Narasimhamurthy B.N. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for time-bound consideration of pending interlocutory applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial concern regarding disproportionate delay in adjudicating competing injunction applications. (Para 3 , 4) |
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATANA, TO CONSIDER AND ADJUDICATE THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN O.S. NO. 04/2026 SEEKING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, WITHIN A TIME FRAME TO BE FIXED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW (ANNEXURE-A1).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
"PRAYER
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to:
a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatana, to consider and adjudicate the interlocutory application filed by the Petitioners under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Proc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
