Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Mohammad Nawaz, G Basavaraja, JJ
State Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Bharath Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of charges and procedural history of the case. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding dowry harassment and cause of death. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. established legal principles concerning the double presumption of innocence in acquittal appeals. (Para 7) |
| 4. evidentiary assessment, noting failure to prove cause of death and lack of witness corroboration. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's final logic for refusing to interfere with the trial court's plausible judgment. (Para 15) |
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(1) AND (3) CR.P.C BY THE S.P.P. FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE TO APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED 04.10.2017 PASSED IN S.C.NO.131/2011 BY THE VIII ADITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE THEREBY ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 3/RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 OF THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498A,302, 304B R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
