Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S. Indiresh, J
Manjunatha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and arguments regarding the impugned revenue order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. limitation on power of revenue authorities to disturb long-standing mutation entries. (Para 5 , 6) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2024, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, TUMAKURU, PASSED IN CASE NO.RP-220/2022, VIDE ANNEXURE-O, THEREBY ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN RP NO.220/2022, VIDE ANNEXURE-M.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri. V. B. Siddaramaiah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde. N., learned High Court Government Pleader.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 16.10.2024 passed by respondent No. 2-Deputy Commissioner, in Revision Petition No. 220/2022, produced at Annexure-O.
3. Sri V.B. Siddaramaiah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
