SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 27822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026


BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS


WRIT PETITION NO.39522 OF 2010 (SC-ST)

C/W

WRIT PETITION NO.50680 OF 2013(SC-ST)


IN W.P. NO.39522/2010


BETWEEN


1. SRI AMAVASAIAH

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR

SRI A THIMMAIAH

AGED 58 YEARS,

R/O GADIKOPPA,

SHIMOGA TALUK.


2. SRI C KALLAPPA

SINCE DEAD BY LRs


a) SMT. RATHNAMMA

W/O LATE L. CHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

R/AT GADIKOPPA VILLAGE

SHIMOGA TALUK AND DISTRICT.


b) SRI L. JAYARAM

S/O B.G. LAKSHMAN

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

R/AT GADIKOPPA VILLAGE

SHIMOGA TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT.


c) SRI RAJAIAH

S/O LATE HANUMAIAH

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

R/AT GADIKOPPA VILLAGE

SHIMOGA TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT.


3. SMT NIRMALA

W/O MAHALINGA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

R/AT MILLAGHATTA

SHIMOGA TOWN.


4. SRI H.D. SRINIVASA GOWDA

S/O DUGGAPPAGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

R/AT MILLAGHATTA

SHIMOGA TOWN, SHIMOGA.


5. SRI E.P. SANNI

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.


a) SMT. REENA SUNNY

W/O LATE E.P. SANNI

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

R/AT NO.750/5, VIJAYANAGAR

HINDALGA, BELGAUM

KARNATAKA – 591108.


b) SMITHA D SOUZA

D/O LATE E.P. SANNI

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

R/AT NO.202, KARASWADA

ASMAS ARCADE

TIVM LE, NORTH GOA

GOA – 403526.


c) SAUMYA SUNNY

D/O LATE E.P. SANNI

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

R/AT NO.549, VIJAYANAGAR

HINDALGA, BELGAUM

KARNATAKA – 591 108.


d) SAMSON S. EZHAMALY

S/O LATE E.P. SANNI

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

R/AT SHAIKH BUILDING

2ND CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR

HINDALGA, BELGAUM

KARNATAKA – 59110.


6. SRI HYDER SHARIFF

S/O ABDUL KHADER

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

R/O BHARATHI COLONY

SHIMOGA TOWN, SHIMOGA.


7. SMT K.M. BHARATHI

W/O K.N. MANJAPPA

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

R/O KUMBARAKERI

SHIMOGA TOWN, SHIMOGA.


8. SRI T.S. VENKATESH

S/O T.B. SIDDAPPA

AGED 50 YEARS

R/AT MILLAGHATTA

SHIMOGA TOWN, SHIMOGA.


9. SRI SYED SIRAJUDDIN

S/O SYED YOUSUFF

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

R/O MILLAGHATTA, SHIMOGA TOWN,

SHIMOGA.


...PETITIONERS


(BY SRI. K.N. NITISH., ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. K.V.NARASIMHAN., ADVOCATE)


AND


1. HOSURAPPA

S/O NAGAPPA

SINCE DEAD BY LRs


A) SMT. YELLAMMA

W/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED 60 YEAS.


B) SRI H. NAGESHAPPA

S/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.


C) SMT. LAKSHMAMMA

D/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.


D) SMT. SAVITHRI

D/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.


E) SMT. SHEELA

D/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS.

ALL ARE R/O GOPALA

RANGANATH EXTENSION

SHIMOGA TOWN, SHIMOGA DISTRICT.


2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSONER

SHIMOGA SUB-DIVISION

SHIMOGA.


3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSONER

SHIMOGA DISTRICT, SHIMOGA.


4. THE COMMISSIONER

SHIMOGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY, SHIMOGA.


…RESPONDENTS


(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP., FOR R2 & R3

SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE, FOR R1A TO R1E

SRI A.V. GANGADHARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)


THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

ORDERS AT ANNEXURE J DATED 3.4.2007 PASSED BY THE

RESPONDENTS NO.2, AND ANNEXURE K, DATED 28.10.2010

PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 AND GRANT AN

INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDERS

AT ANNEXURES-J, DATED 3.4.2007 PASSED BY THE

RESPONDENTS NO2, AND ANNEXURE K, DATED 28.10.2010

PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3, IN CASE NO.

SC/ST/1/2007-08 AND SC/ST/4/2007-08 AND ETC.


IN W.P. NO. 50680/2013


BETWEEN


SHIMOGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

SHIMOGA, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER

COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, 100 FEET ROAD

VINOBA NAGAR, SHIMOGA – 577 204.


...PETITIONER


(SRI A.V. GANGADHARAPPA, ADVOCATE)


AND


1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

SHIMOGA DISTRICT

SHIMOGA – 577 201.


2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

SHIMOGA SUB DIVISION

SHIMOGA - 577 201.


3. AMAVASAIAH S/O GUJJARAIAH

SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

SMT THIMMAMMA

W/O LATE AMAVASAIAH

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

R/O MILLAGHATTA

SHIMOGA TALUK AND

DISTRICT – 577 201.

(RESPONDENT NO.3 IS DELETED

VIDE ORDER DATED 26/08/2015)


4. THIMMAIAH

S/O LATE AMAVASAIAH

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

C/O H RAJANNA

R/A NO.E-135, 2ND CROSS

GOPALAGOWDA LAYOUT

SHIMOGA – 577 201.


5. SMT YELLAMMA

W/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.


6. H NAGESHAPPA

S/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

RESPONDENTS NO.5 AND 6

ARE RESIDING

BEHIND SHANIDEVARA TEMPLE

KORAMARA BEEDHI, GOPALA

SHIMOGA TOWN -577 201.


7. SMT LAKSHMAMMA

D/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.


8. SMT SAVITHRI

D/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.


9. SMT SHEELA

D/O LATE HOSURAPPA

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

RESPONDENTS NO.7 TO 9

ARE RESIDING

OPPOSITE TO PADMA TALKIES

KORAMARA KERI, GOPALA

SHIMOGA TOWN – 577 201.


10. KALLAPPA

S/O LATE GUJJARAIAH

SINCE DEAD BY LRs.


10(A) SMT. RATHNAMMA

W/O LATE L. CHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

RESIDING AT GADIKOPPA

VILLAGE, SHIMOGA TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT.


10(B) L. JAYARAM

S/O B.G. LAKSHMAN

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

RESIDING AT GADIKOPPA VILLAGE

SHIMOGA TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT.


10(C) SRI RAJAIAH

S/O LATE HANUMAIAH

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

RESIDING AT GADIKOPPA VILLAGE

SHIMOGA TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT.


…RESPONDENTS


(BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 & R2

R3 DELETED V/O/D.26.08.15

R4 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED

SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R9

SRI. K.N. NITISH., ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. K.V.NARASIMHAN., ADVOCATE FOR R10(A) TO

R10(C))


THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR

THE RECORDS QUASH THE ORDER DT.3/4/2007 PASSED BY

THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-E AND THE ORDER DT.28.10.10

PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX-F RESPECTIVELY IN SO FAR

AS THEY RELATE TO THE DIRECTION FOR PAYMENT OF

COMPENSATION IS CONCERNED AND ETC.


THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND

RESERVED ON 09.04.2026 AND COMING ON FOR

PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS, THIS DAY, THIS COURT

MADE THE FOLLOWING:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

CAV COMMON ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS)

These two writ petitions are filed in respect of the impugned orders passed by the respondent-Assistant Commissioner, Shivamogga Sub-Division and the Deputy Commissioner, Shivamogga District. Therefore, these two writ petitions were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Brief facts which are germane for consideration of these writ petitions are that 3 Acres 19 Guntas of land in Sy.No.88 of Gadikoppa village, Shivamogga Taluk and District were granted in favour of one Sri.Nagappa in the year 1952. Saguvali Chit was issued in favour of Sri.Nagappa on 09.01.1953. Part of the land measuring 1 Acre 29 ½ Guntas were sold by Smt. Yallamma, wife of Sri.Nagappa in favour of the 1st petitioner - Sri.Amavasaiah on 27.09.1967. The remaining extent of 1 Acre and 29 ½ Guntas were sold by Smt.Yallamma in favour of the 2nd petitioner – Sri.Kallappa on 26.11.1967. It should be noticed here that during the course of these proceedings, petitioners No.1 and 2 died and their legal representatives have been brought on record. Respondent No.1, Sri.Hosurappa, the son of the original grantee Sri.Nagappa, filed a petition before the Assistant Commissioner on 01.02.1989, invoking Sections 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (for short, ‘the PTCL Act’). The petition was allowed on 28.03.1989, while directing resumption and restoration of the lands in favour of the legal heirs of the original grantee. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioners No.1 and 2 filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner. In the meanwhile, part of the lands were notified for acquisition at the hands of the 4th respondent-Shivamogga Urban Development Authority (which has also filed the connected writ petition in W.P.No.50680/2013). The Deputy Commissioner allowed the appeals and set aside the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner. Aggrieved by the order, the contesting respondent No.1 herein filed W.P.No.14550/1992. This Court held that the Assistant Commissioner was required to find out whether the land was granted for upset price or a price lesser than the upset price or whether it was a free grant. The Assistant Commissioner was required to state the rule applicable, having regard to the date of the grant and the nature of the grant. This Court found that there were contradictory opinions in this regard at the hands of the Assistant Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner. Therefore, the writ petition was allowed while quashing the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner as well as the Deputy Commissioner and the matter was remanded back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration.

On remand, the Assistant Commissioner recorded a finding that as per the grant records, the lands were granted in favour of Sri.Nagappa on 17.07.1952 in terms of order bearing No.DSA 4 DD 48/1951-52 and Saguvali Chit was issued on 09.01.1953. It was found that the land was granted freely and therefore, the non-alienation clause applicable was 15 years. However, the Assistant Commissioner was of the opinion that commencing from 17.07.1952, the date on which the grant was made, 15 years would elapse on 16.07.1967 and the sale transactions happened on 27.09.1967 and 26.11.1967 and therefore, the provisions of the PTCL were not attracted in the present case. Accordingly, the petition filed by respondent No.1 was dismissed. In appeal, the Deputy Commissioner upheld the orders of the Assistant Commissioner. Respondent No.1 filed writ petition No.22094/1998 and this Court found that the relevant rule applicable as on the date of the grant viz., 17.07.1952 was sub-rule(8) of Rule 43 of the Mysore Land Revenue Rules, framed under Section 233 of the Mysore Land Revenue Code and according to the said Rule, the period of non-alienation was forever and therefore, on facts, it was found that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top