Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R Devdas, J
Farooque L Dadabhoy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of land acquisition, subsequent forfeiture, and re-transfer proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding locus standi, non-disclosure of facts, and validity of land sales. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. courts observation on the clean hands doctrine and lack of standing due to prior forfeiture. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.07.2013 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.PTCL.SR(DE)66/2006-07 AS PER ANNEXURE - A AND ALSO THE ORDER DATED 10.07.2025 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.PTCL APPEAL NO.31/2015-16 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ETC .,
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON 02.02.2026 AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
CAV ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS)
The petitioner is not only aggrieved of the impugned orders dated 22.07.2013 and 10.07.2025 at Annexures ‘A’ and ‘B’ passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Doddaballapur Sub-Division and the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Rural District
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
