Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Jyoti M, J
N.Narasimha Swamy – Appellant
Versus
Authorized Officer, South Indian Bank Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of parties and the reliefs sought by the petitioner under the act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. non-maintainability of writ petitions against sarfaesi action. (Para 3 , 4) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Vinay Kumar, counsel on behalf of Sri.V.B.Ravishankar, for the petitioner and Sri.Narayan Shenoy, counsel for caveator/ respondent have appeared in person.
2. The writ petition is filed seeking following reliefs:
(a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and to quash or the measures initiated under provisions of SARFAESI Act; at Annexure-A.
(b) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent bank to accept the one time settlement proposal vide Annexure-A.
(c) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the Sale Notice dated 19.01.2024 published in Indian Express Daily Kannada newspaper dated 19.01.2024 vide Annexure-A as the same is issued during pendency of application filed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal in SA.No.317/2023 on the file of Debt Reco
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
