SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28004

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P Sree Sudha, J
Akshatha – Appellant
Versus
Sathyanarayana Mande – Respondent
CP No. 119 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.M. Siddamallappa
For the Respondents: B.S. Raghu Prasad

In matrimonial cases, the convenience of the wife, especially when caring for dependents, is a paramount consideration for the transfer of proceedings under S. 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, provided that the respondent's participation can be facilitated through technological means.

Headnote:The proceedings concern a petition filed under S. 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the transfer of a divorce petition from the III Additional Family Court, Bengaluru, to the Principal Family Court, Shivamogga. The wife sought transfer on grounds of convenience, citing the need to care for her minor daughter, her unemployment, and the significant distance between the two locations. The court determined that it would be highly inconvenient for the wife to travel long distances with a minor child. The core issue is the balance of convenience in matrimonial transfer petitions. The court reasoned that in cases where the wife resides with dependents and faces financial or logistical hardship, courts must give prominence to the balance of convenience to ensure her access to justice. The court's ratio emphasized that while protecting the wife's convenience, the needs of the working husband must also be mitigated through technology. The civil petition is allowed, and the divorce proceedings are ordered to be transferred to the Principal Family Court, Shivamogga, with liberty for the respondent to attend proceedings via video conferencing.

Table of Content
1. basis for transfer petition due to logistical hardship. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. balancing party convenience through technological accommodation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

THIS CP IS FILED U/S. 24 OF CPC PRAYING TO WITHDRAW THE FILE IN MC NO.6784/25 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU AND TO TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE FILE OF LEARNED PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA AND TO PASS SUITABLE ORDER DIRECTING THE COURT TO CONSIDER MATTER AND TO PASS ORDER ADJUDICATING THE MATTER ON MERIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

ORAL ORDER

Heard the arguments of both sides.

2. Though this matter has come up for admission, it is taken up for final hearing and disposed of by this order.

3. This transfer petition is filed by wife/petitioner for transfer of M.C.No.6784 of 2025 filed by husband/respondent for divorce before the III Additional Family Court, Bangalore to the Court of Learned Principal Family Court, Shivamogga.

4. It is contended that the petitioner is residing at Shivamogga along with her minor daughter and mother. Her father has passed away. The petitioner is not working and earning. The respondent is working as a Software Engineer in Bengaluru. The distance between Bengaluru and Shivamogga is 305 kilometres. It is also stated that the petitioner has filed Crl.Misc.No.296/2025 before the Principal Family Court, Shivamogga and it is still pending.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent stated that the petitioner is at liberty to attend the proceedings through video conferencing.

6. Admittedly, the petitioner is residing at Shivamogga along with her 10-year-old daughter and aged mother. In such circumstances, it would be inconvenient for her to travel to Bengaluru on every date of hearing along with her minor child. Therefore, this Court finds it just and reasonable to transfer M.C.No.6784 of 2025, filed by the respondent-husband for divorce from the III Additional Family Court, Bengaluru, to the Court of learned Principal Family Court, Shivamogga.

7. However, considering the fact that respondent is working in Bengaluru, he is at liberty to file his chief affidavit and he can be cross-examined either through a Court Commissioner or by way of video conferencing. The Family Court is specifically directed not to insist upon his personal presence unless there is any requirement.

Accordingly, the civil petition is allowed.

In view of disposal of the main petition, I.A.No.1/2026 is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top