SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28112

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
MRS. PADMAJA.S – Appellant
Versus
M/S CANARA BANK – Respondent


THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.V.D.Siddappa, counsel on behalf of Sri.Ramesha H.E., for the petitioners and Sri.Vignesh Shetty, counsel for the respondent appeared in person.

2. The writ petition is filed seeking following reliefs:

(i) Declare that the possession Notice dated 06.05.2023 Ref No.41/SARFAESI/RECOVERY/2023-24 issued by respondent No.1 at Annexure-C is illegal and quash the same;

(ii) Allow this writ petition with costs; and

(iii) Grant any other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the interests of justice.

3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the papers with care.

4. The petitioners grievance is about the issuance of a notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The relief sought by the petitioners cannot be granted under writ jurisdiction. The Apex Court has settled the law in a catena of decisions that a possession notice cannot be challenged by filing a writ petition. The petition is devoid of merits. Accordingly, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top