SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28164

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
SRI. BHAVANNA – Appellant
Versus
G M RAMAKRISHNAPPA – Respondent


THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 8.12.2020 ON AN APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 OF CPC MARKED AT ANNEXURE-E FILED IN O.S.NO.46/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BAGEPALLI AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 OF CPC FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN & ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed challenging the order dated 08.12.2020 passed in OS.No.46/2014 by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagepalli (for short ‘the trial Court’).

2. Sri.Manoj M. Naik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.A.Nagarajappa, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a suit seeking the reliefs of declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction against the respondent. In the said suit, the respondent filed a detailed written statement and contested the proceedings. After conclusion of the trial, the petitioner filed an application seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner, which came to be rejected by the trial Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top