Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S Vishwajith Shetty, J
Mohamed Sameer – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and nature of the bail petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factors justifying bail including marital cohabitation and age disputes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. granting of bail subject to specific regulatory conditions. (Para 7) |
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.64/2025 VIDE SPL.C.NO.234/2025, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376(2)(n) OF IPC, U/S 4,5(L),6 OF POCSO ACT, 2012, U/S 9 AND 10 OF CHILD MARRIAGE RESTRAINT ACT, PENDING BEFORE THE 1st ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
1. Accused in Spl.C.No.234/2025 pending before the Court of I Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, arising out of Crime No.64/2025 registered by Channapatna East Police Station, Bengaluru South for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(n) of IPC and Sections 4, 5(L) & 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sections 9 & 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 2016, is before this Court in this petition filed under Sec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
