Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S Vishwajith Shetty, J
Sakamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the criminal petition seeking anticipatory bail. (Para 1) |
| 2. procedural history and the context of the bail application. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. judicial reasoning regarding the lack of specific allegations justifying bail. (Para 4) |
| 4. grant of anticipatory bail with stipulated conditions. (Para 5) |
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.PC (FILED U/S 482 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN EVENT OF THEIR ARREST INC R.No.14/2026 P/U/S 85,89,115(2),351(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS 2023 P/U/S 3, 4 OF D.P ACT 1961 OF RESPONDENT RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE, KANAKAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND J.M.F.C COURT KANAKAPURA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
1. Accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.14/2026 registered by the Ramanagara Women Police Station, Bengaluru South, for the offences punishable under Sections 85 , 89, 115(2), 351(2), 352 r/w 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, is before this Court in this Criminal Petition filed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
