Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.Pandit, K.Manmadha Rao, JJ
Ambika – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges tribunal's refusal to stay premature transfer within headquarters. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court refuses to interfere with transfer order where no material hardship is demonstrated. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01/06/2026 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.2670/2026 BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
1. The petitioner, a Deputy Tahsildar in Revenue Department is before this Court, questioning the order dated 01.06.2026 passed in Application No.2670/2026 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal at Bengaluru (for short “Tribunal”), rejecting petitioner’s prayer for stay of transfer O.M. dated 27.05.2026, transferring her to the post of Audit Sheristedar at the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District.
2. Heard learned counsel Sri.M.K.Prith
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
