SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


NC: 2026:KHC:27481


WP No. 3037 of 2025


DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026


BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN


WRIT PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2025 (CS-RES)


BETWEEN:

SMT. GANGAMMA

W/O LATE SRI. V. VENKATARAMANNA,

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 467, 1ST MAIN,

4TH CROSS, PANCHASHEELA NAGARA,

MUDALAPALYA,

BENGALURU 560072.

…PETITIONER


(BY SMT. ANU, ADVOCATE APPEARING FOR SRI. N. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE)


AND:

1. SRIRAMA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,

REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER,

NO. 146, 7TH CROSS,

SRI. BALAGANGADHARANATHA SWAMIJI ROAD,

MALLESHWARAM,

BENGALURU - 560003.

2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (R441),

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANKS FEDERATION LTD.,

NO. 132, K.H. ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560027.

3. THE SALES OFFICER,

SRIRAMA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,

MALLESHWARAM,

BENGALURU - 560003.

…RESPONDENTS


(BY SRI. THRIBHUVAN K., ADVOCATE APPEARING FOR SMT. RATHNAMALA N., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R2)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE DATED 04.02.2025 FIXED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BANK WITH RESPECT TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BASED ON THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY ON 29.08.2024 IN C.E.P. NO. A.R.E/ UBP/261/2023-24 IN DISPUTE NO.ARD/UBF/935/2024-25 VIDE ORDER DATED 03.05.2024 BY DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PAY A SUM OF RS.17,73,750/- (RUPEES SEVENTEEN LAKH SEVENTY THREE THOUSAND SEVEN FIFTY ONLY) IN FAVOUR OF 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

ORAL ORDER

The proceedings were initiated against the petitioner on account of the default in repayment of a loan borrowed from respondent No.1 – Co-operative Society Bank. The writ petition schedule property was brought to sale by way of an auction notice dated 31.12.2024.

2. The writ petition is filed challenging the same with the following prayers:

"a. Issue writ in the nature of certiorari or order of quashing the auction notice dated 04.02.2025 fixed by the 1st Respondent bank with respect to the schedule property based on the order passed by the 2nd Respondent authority on 29.08.2024 in C.E.P.No.A.R.E/UBF/261/2023-24 in Dispute No.ARD/UBF/935/2024-25 vide order dated 03.05.2024 by directing the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.17,73,750/- (Rupees Seventeen Lakh Seventy Three Thousand Seven Fifty only) in favour of 1st Respondent vide Annexure-A;

b. Directing the Respondent No.1 bank to grant time to pay the pending installment;

c. Grant any other relief or relief's as this Hon'ble court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

3. This Court on 01.02.2025 has passed the following order:

"Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent No.2.

Issue emergent notice to respondent Nos.1 and 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would deposit 20% of the amount as indicated in the auction notice, if some time is granted by this Court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the loan obtained by the petitioner was Rs.45,00,000/- and she was regular in paying the installments nearly for 14 months. However, towards an untold incident in the family, she had to spend a substantial amount for the medical expenses of her son, who met with an accident and as such, she has become a defaulter. It is submitted that the auction is scheduled to be held on 04.02.2025 in respect of two properties and against one property, the petitioner has filed Writ Petition No.3048/2025(F.R.Nos.3483/2025). As the petitioner has shown her willingness to deposit certain amount, there shall be a stay of the confirmation of the sale, subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- with respondent No.1 - Bank within a period of six weeks from today.

List along with W.P.No.3048/2025."

4. The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 3, upon instructions, submits that by virtue of the interim order of this Court, the sale process of the writ petition schedule property has been frustrated and no auction pursuant to the auction notice dated 31.12.2024 has been initiated. He further submits that the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy under Sections 105 and 106 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Even otherwise he submits that the respondents are required to initiate fresh auction proceedings in the light of the interim order passed by this Court. He further submits that, if the petitioner were to pay up the dues done, in that event, the property will not be auctioned.

5. As proceedings pursuant to the auction notice dated 31.12.2024 is frustrated, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to respondent No.1 - Co-operative Society Bank to proceed for r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top