Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Ashok S. Kinagi, J
K. Vasudeva – Appellant
Versus
Bengaluru Co-Operative Milk Union Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for mandamus regarding pending pension representation. (Para 1) |
| 2. court directive for time-bound disposal of administrative representation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.08.23, WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNX-E AND FURTHER BE PLEASE TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY HIGHER PENSION TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation vide Annexure-E dated 14.08.2023, wherein the petitioner has prayed for higher pension. Respondent No.2 has not considered the representation and passed any order. Hence, this writ petition.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, if reasonable time is granted, respondent No.2 will consider the representation vide Annexure-E and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
3. In view of the submission made by learned cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
