Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. Nagaprasanna, J
Umamaheshwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis regarding property disputes, alleged forgery, and criminal fir registration. (Para 24) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding the civil vs. criminal nature of property disputes. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 3. civil and criminal proceedings can coexist; criminal investigation should not be thwarted. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF THE BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 09.08.2025 IN CRIME NO. 247/2025 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 351(2), 352, 61(2) READ WITH SECTION 3(5) OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AT BENGALURU, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED. (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 10.01.2025 IN CRIME NO. 04/2025 OF THE RESPONDENT RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR POLICE STATION REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 3(5), 316(2), 318(4), 329(3), 336(2), 336(3), 340, 351(2), 352, 62 AND 79 OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
