SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28715

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
SRI RAGHUNATH NADIG Y C – Appellant
Versus
SRI DINESH S – Respondent


THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/QUASH THE ORDER DATED 25.04.2019, PASSED IN C.C.NO.6577/2018, BY THE LEARNED XXVI A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU ALLOWING, THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT U/S 143A(2) OF N.I (AMENDED) ACT.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL ORDER

None appears for petitioner.

2. Since matter involved lies within a short compass and pendency of matter has lead to no progress in main matter, it is taken up for final disposal.

3. None appears for petitioner.

4. Challenging order dated 25.04.2019 passed by XXVI ACMM, Bengaluru, in C.C.no.6577/2018 under Section 143A(2) of Negotiable Instruments (Amended) Act, 1981 (NI Act), this petition is filed.

5. As per grounds urged in petition, impugned order was challenged on ground of illegal, arbitrary and unjust and that there was no basis for awarding interim compensation on ground that it was mandatory and etc.

6. On other hand, Sri L.T.Gopal, learned counsel for respondent opposed petition. It was submitted that by taking note of cheque amount involved, Trial Court had granted interim compensat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top